Eccouncil 212-82 Exam - Topic 6 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-82 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 6

Kayden successfully cracked the final round of interviews at an organization. After a few days, he received his offer letter through an official company email address. The email stated that the selected candidate should respond within a specified time. Kayden accepted the opportunity and provided an e-signature on the offer letter, then replied to the same email address. The company validated the e-signature and added his details to their database. Here, Kayden could not deny the company's message, and the company could not deny Kayden's signature.

Which of the following information security elements was described in the above scenario?

AAvailability

BNon-repudiation

CIntegrity

DConfidentiality

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Herman at May 25, 2023, 08:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-82 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Blair

10 months ago

I thought integrity was more about data accuracy, not signatures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Milly

10 months ago

Availability doesn't fit this scenario at all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

10 months ago

Totally agree, it's all about non-repudiation here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizette

10 months ago

Wait, can an e-signature really be that secure?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rossana

11 months ago

Sounds like non-repudiation to me!

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

11 months ago

I keep mixing up these terms, but I feel like this is definitely not about confidentiality since it's about the acknowledgment of the agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coletta

11 months ago

This reminds me of a practice question where we discussed how e-signatures provide proof of agreement. So, I lean towards non-repudiation here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about integrity being related to data being accurate. This seems more about the agreement itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patrick

11 months ago

I think this scenario is about non-repudiation because Kayden can't deny his acceptance after signing the offer letter.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The details about Freddie's business and the wheat harvest are interesting, but I'm not sure how they relate to Harmon's organizational model. I'll need to review my notes on that model to figure out what the key inputs would be. Maybe I can eliminate some of the options and narrow it down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Camellia

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The options cover a range of brand-related concepts, and I'm not entirely sure how to differentiate them in this context. I'll have to review my notes and try to figure out which one best fits the scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

11 months ago

Okay, let me break this down. I know cross-functional teams are made up of people from different departments, but I'm not sure if they select their own leader. Gotta think this through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hollis

11 months ago

I'm uncertain about the correct choice. It seems like improved performance could be linked to fraud, but can that really be an example by itself?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dolores

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the order of the Sprint Goal and Sprint Backlog. Let me think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

1 year ago

The answer is definitely B) Non-repudiation. Kayden's move was smoother than a freshly waxed slip 'n' slide. The company couldn't deny his signature even if they tried!

upvoted 0 times

Willie

1 year ago

Non-repudiation played a key role in validating Kayden's acceptance of the job offer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mable

1 year ago

The company had to accept Kayden's acceptance of the offer due to non-repudiation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

1 year ago

Kayden's e-signature on the offer letter ensured non-repudiation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katy

1 year ago

Ha! Kayden must have used his secret 'Ninja Signing Technique' to crack that offer letter. I bet the company was like, 'Whoa, where did that e-signature come from?'

upvoted 0 times

Gregg

1 year ago

User 4: Definitely, they couldn't deny his signature!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cornell

1 year ago

User 3: The company must have been impressed with his e-signature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, he probably used his 'Ninja Signing Technique'!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

1 year ago

User 1: Kayden must have some serious skills to crack that offer letter!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

1 year ago

Probably! His 'Ninja Signing Technique' must have left them in awe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracie

1 year ago

I wonder if they were surprised by how quickly he responded.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yun

1 year ago

Yeah, he definitely impressed the company with his e-signature.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

1 year ago

Kayden must have some serious skills to crack that offer letter!

upvoted 0 times

...

Aracelis

1 year ago

I agree, B) Non-repudiation is the right answer. This scenario demonstrates how digital signatures and electronic records can provide evidence of an agreement, preventing either party from denying their involvement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willow

1 year ago

The correct answer is B) Non-repudiation. Kayden's e-signature and the company's validation ensure that neither party can deny the transaction that took place.

upvoted 0 times