Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 212-82 Topic 12 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-82 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 12
[All 212-82 Questions]

Karter, a security professional, deployed a honeypot on the organization's network for luring attackers who attempt to breach the network. For this purpose, he configured a type of honeypot that simulates a real OS as well as the applications and services of a target network. Furthermore, the honeypot deployed by Karter only responds to pre-configured commands.

Identify the type of Honeypot deployed by Karter in the above scenario.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The number of files in the ''Sensitive Corporate Documents'' folder is 4. This can be verified by initiating a remote connection to the target machine from the ''Attacker Machine-1'' using Theef client. Theef is a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) that allows an attacker to remotely control a victim's machine and perform various malicious activities. To connect to the target machine using Theef client, one can follow these steps:

Launch Theef client from Z:CCT-ToolsCCT Module 01 Information Security Threats and VulnerabilitiesRemote Access Trojans (RAT)Theef on the ''Attacker Machine-1''.

Enter the IP address of the target machine (20.20.10.26) and click on Connect.

Wait for a few seconds until a connection is established and a message box appears saying ''Connection Successful''.

Click on OK to close the message box and access the remote desktop of the target machine.

Navigate to the Documents directory and locate the ''Sensitive Corporate Documents'' folder.

Open the folder and count the number of files in it. The screenshot below shows an example of performing these steps: Reference: [Theef Client Tutorial], [Screenshot of Theef client showing remote desktop and folder]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lanie
16 days ago
A low-interaction honeypot, for sure. Karter's not messing around, he's keeping it simple and secure. I bet the attackers will be like, 'Wait, this is it? I thought hacking was supposed to be fun!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
19 days ago
Aha! This is a classic low-interaction honeypot. Karter's playing it safe, but at least the attackers will have a fun time with those pre-configured commands. Hopefully, they'll get stuck in an infinite loop or something.
upvoted 0 times
Troy
3 days ago
I agree, low-interaction honeypots are a great way to gather information without risking too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonny
27 days ago
Hmm, I'd say it's a medium-interaction honeypot. Simulating the OS and apps sounds more advanced than a low-interaction one.
upvoted 0 times
Deeanna
20 days ago
I think it's a high-interaction honeypot. It responds to pre-configured commands, which sounds pretty advanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nichelle
1 months ago
I think it is a low-interaction honeypot because it only responds to pre-configured commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
I disagree with Ryan. I believe it is a medium-interaction honeypot because it simulates real OS and applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
Definitely a low-interaction honeypot. It simulates the OS and services, but only responds to pre-configured commands. No way it's a high-interaction one!
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
24 days ago
Yeah, it makes sense since it only responds to pre-configured commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
29 days ago
I agree, it's definitely a low-interaction honeypot.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
2 months ago
I think the type of honeypot deployed by Karter is a high-interaction honeypot.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel