New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil 212-81 Exam - Topic 7 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-81 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 7
[All 212-81 Questions]

This hash function uses 512-bit blocks and implements preset constants that change after each repetition. Each block is hashed into a 256-bit block through four branches that divides each 512 block into sixteen 32-bit words that are further encrypted and rearranged.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Brute force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_attack

A brute-force attack consists of an attacker submitting many passwords or passphrases with the hope of eventually guessing correctly. The attacker systematically checks all possible passwords and passphrases until the correct one is found. Alternatively, the attacker can attempt to guess the key which is typically created from the password using a key derivation function. This is known as an exhaustive key search.

A brute-force attack is a cryptanalytic attack that can, in theory, be used to attempt to decrypt any encrypted data (except for data encrypted in an information-theoretically secure manner). Such an attack might be used when it is not possible to take advantage of other weaknesses in an encryption system (if any exist) that would make the task easier.

Incorrect answers:

Rainbow tables -is a precomputed table for caching the output of cryptographic hash functions, usually for cracking password hashes. Tables are usually used in recovering a key derivation function (or credit card numbers, etc.) up to a certain length consisting of a limited set of characters.

Dictionary attack -is a form of brute force attack technique for defeating a cipher or authentication mechanism by trying to determine its decryption key or passphrase by trying thousands or millions of likely possibilities, such as words in a dictionary or previously used passwords, often from lists obtained from past security breaches.

Shoulder surfing -is a type of social engineering technique used to obtain information such as personal identification numbers (PINs), passwords and other confidential data by looking over the victim's shoulder, either from keystrokes on a device or sensitive information being spoken and heard, also known as eavesdropping.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Raul
3 months ago
Agreed, it’s gotta be SHA-256.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
3 months ago
RSA? Really? That’s not even a hash function!
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
3 months ago
Wait, 512-bit blocks? I thought SHA-256 used 512-bit input but outputs 256-bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
4 months ago
Definitely not FORK-256, that's a different beast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
4 months ago
Sounds like SHA-256 to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
4 months ago
I don't think it's RSA since that's an asymmetric encryption algorithm, not a hash function. But I can't recall the exact details of FORK-256.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused because I thought SHA-1 also dealt with block sizes, but it uses 160 bits, right? So it can't be that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
This sounds a lot like SHA-256 to me, especially the part about dividing into 32-bit words. I think I saw a similar question in our practice exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
5 months ago
I remember studying SHA-256 and how it processes 512-bit blocks, but I'm not entirely sure about the specifics of the preset constants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
5 months ago
I'm feeling good about this one. The description of the hashing process aligns with what I know about SHA-256, so I'm going to go with that as my final answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. The part about "preset constants that change after each repetition" doesn't sound like standard SHA-256. I'll need to double-check the other options to see if any of them match that detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The 512-bit blocks, 32-bit words, and 256-bit output point to SHA-256. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
5 months ago
Hmm, the description of the 512-bit blocks and 256-bit output sounds a lot like SHA-256, but I'm not totally sure. I'll have to think through the other options to see if any of them fit better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
5 months ago
This sounds like a question on cryptographic hash functions. I'll need to carefully review the details about the block size, number of branches, and encryption process to determine which hash function is being described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. First, I'd check the box for Info under Log Files to make sure the logging is enabled. If that doesn't work, I'd try setting the root log level to debug to see if that helps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Dynamics 365 Sales features. I'll focus on the key aspects of managing the sales pipeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
9 months ago
Ah, the old 'hash function disguised as a riddle' trick. Classic certification exam move. *rolls eyes*
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
8 months ago
D) RSA
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
9 months ago
C) SHA-1
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
9 months ago
B) FORK-256
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
9 months ago
A) SHA-256
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
I'd say this question is a real hash-slinger! *chuckles* But seriously, gotta go with SHA-256 on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
10 months ago
RSA? Really? This is clearly not an asymmetric encryption algorithm. Someone needs to go back to Cryptography 101.
upvoted 0 times
Delila
8 months ago
I agree, SHA-256 is the best option given the description of the hash function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
8 months ago
Yeah, RSA is definitely not the right choice here. It's an asymmetric encryption algorithm, not a hash function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
8 months ago
SHA-256 is the correct answer. It is a hash function that uses 512-bit blocks and implements preset constants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
8 months ago
D) RSA
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
8 months ago
C) SHA-1
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
9 months ago
B) FORK-256
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
9 months ago
A) SHA-256
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
10 months ago
The 'further encrypted and rearranged' part has me leaning towards SHA-1, but the 256-bit output doesn't quite fit. Tricky one!
upvoted 0 times
Gregg
9 months ago
User 3: I believe it could be SHA-1 based on the encryption process described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
9 months ago
User 2: I'm not so sure, maybe it's FORK-256 since it involves further encryption and rearrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
10 months ago
User 1: I think the hash function you're referring to is SHA-256.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viva
10 months ago
Hmm, the 'preset constants' and 'four branches' make me think this might be FORK-256. Interesting twist on the usual hash function.
upvoted 0 times
Page
9 months ago
Yes, FORK-256 seems to match the unique features mentioned in the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
9 months ago
I think you might be right, FORK-256 does sound like a good fit for the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
9 months ago
D) RSA
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
9 months ago
C) SHA-1
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
10 months ago
B) FORK-256
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
10 months ago
A) SHA-256
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Boris
11 months ago
Sounds like SHA-256 to me. The 512-bit blocks and 256-bit output are a dead giveaway.
upvoted 0 times
Verona
9 months ago
RSA doesn't match the description. It's definitely SHA-256.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
9 months ago
D) RSA
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
9 months ago
Not SHA-1. The 512-bit blocks and 256-bit output point to SHA-256.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
10 months ago
C) SHA-1
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
10 months ago
No, it's not FORK-256. The description matches SHA-256.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
10 months ago
B) FORK-256
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
10 months ago
Definitely SHA-256. It fits the description perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
10 months ago
A) SHA-256
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ammie
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think SHA-1 could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
11 months ago
I agree with Jettie, SHA-256 makes sense for the description given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) SHA-256.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel