Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

EC-Council 212-81 Exam - Topic 7 Question 29 Discussion

Posted by Nu on Apr 08, 2024 at 08:07 PM

This hash function uses 512-bit blocks and implements preset constants that change after each repetition. Each block is hashed into a 256-bit block through four branches that divides each 512 block into sixteen 32-bit words that are further encrypted and rearranged.

Suggested Answer: C

Brute force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_attack

A brute-force attack consists of an attacker submitting many passwords or passphrases with the hope of eventually guessing correctly. The attacker systematically checks all possible passwords and passphrases until the correct one is found. Alternatively, the attacker can attempt to guess the key which is typically created from the password using a key derivation function. This is known as an exhaustive key search.

A brute-force attack is a cryptanalytic attack that can, in theory, be used to attempt to decrypt any encrypted data (except for data encrypted in an information-theoretically secure manner). Such an attack might be used when it is not possible to take advantage of other weaknesses in an encryption system (if any exist) that would make the task easier.

Incorrect answers:

Rainbow tables -is a precomputed table for caching the output of cryptographic hash functions, usually for cracking password hashes. Tables are usually used in recovering a key derivation function (or credit card numbers, etc.) up to a certain length consisting of a limited set of characters.

Dictionary attack -is a form of brute force attack technique for defeating a cipher or authentication mechanism by trying to determine its decryption key or passphrase by trying thousands or millions of likely possibilities, such as words in a dictionary or previously used passwords, often from lists obtained from past security breaches.

Shoulder surfing -is a type of social engineering technique used to obtain information such as personal identification numbers (PINs), passwords and other confidential data by looking over the victim's shoulder, either from keystrokes on a device or sensitive information being spoken and heard, also known as eavesdropping.


Get Premium 212-81 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
53 comments · newest first
RA
Raul 11 months ago
Agreed, it’s gotta be SHA-256.
ST
Stephanie 11 months ago
RSA? Really? That’s not even a hash function!
TI
Timothy 11 months ago
Wait, 512-bit blocks? I thought SHA-256 used 512-bit input but outputs 256-bit.
LE
Lewis 12 months ago
Definitely not FORK-256, that's a different beast.
LA
Latrice 12 months ago
Sounds like SHA-256 to me!
CE
Celeste 1 year ago
I don't think it's RSA since that's an asymmetric encryption algorithm, not a hash function. But I can't recall the exact details of FORK-256.
DE
Delila 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused because I thought SHA-1 also dealt with block sizes, but it uses 160 bits, right? So it can't be that.
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
This sounds a lot like SHA-256 to me, especially the part about dividing into 32-bit words. I think I saw a similar question in our practice exam.
CL
Clorinda 1 year ago
I remember studying SHA-256 and how it processes 512-bit blocks, but I'm not entirely sure about the specifics of the preset constants.
ST
Stevie 1 year ago
I'm feeling good about this one. The description of the hashing process aligns with what I know about SHA-256, so I'm going to go with that as my final answer.
JU
Jutta 1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. The part about "preset constants that change after each repetition" doesn't sound like standard SHA-256. I'll need to double-check the other options to see if any of them match that detail.
DE
Desire 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The 512-bit blocks, 32-bit words, and 256-bit output point to SHA-256. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer here.
IE
Iesha 1 year ago
Hmm, the description of the 512-bit blocks and 256-bit output sounds a lot like SHA-256, but I'm not totally sure. I'll have to think through the other options to see if any of them fit better.
ST
Stevie 1 year ago
This sounds like a question on cryptographic hash functions. I'll need to carefully review the details about the block size, number of branches, and encryption process to determine which hash function is being described.
RO
Ronny 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. First, I'd check the box for Info under Log Files to make sure the logging is enabled. If that doesn't work, I'd try setting the root log level to debug to see if that helps.
AI
Aimee 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Dynamics 365 Sales features. I'll focus on the key aspects of managing the sales pipeline.
BE
Beth 1 year ago
Ah, the old 'hash function disguised as a riddle' trick. Classic certification exam move. *rolls eyes*
DU
Dulce 1 year ago
↳ replying to Beth
D) RSA
GE
Georgeanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Beth
C) SHA-1
HI
Hildegarde 1 year ago
↳ replying to Beth
B) FORK-256
RO
Roy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Beth
A) SHA-256
FL
Fletcher 1 year ago
I'd say this question is a real hash-slinger! *chuckles* But seriously, gotta go with SHA-256 on this one.
MA
Margot 1 year ago
RSA? Really? This is clearly not an asymmetric encryption algorithm. Someone needs to go back to Cryptography 101.
DE
Delila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margot
I agree, SHA-256 is the best option given the description of the hash function.
WE
Wendell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margot
Yeah, RSA is definitely not the right choice here. It's an asymmetric encryption algorithm, not a hash function.
RO
Robt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margot
SHA-256 is the correct answer. It is a hash function that uses 512-bit blocks and implements preset constants.
TW
Twana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margot
D) RSA
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margot
C) SHA-1
PE
Peter 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margot
B) FORK-256
JO
Jonell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margot
A) SHA-256
NO
Noel 1 year ago
The 'further encrypted and rearranged' part has me leaning towards SHA-1, but the 256-bit output doesn't quite fit. Tricky one!
GR
Gregg 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noel
User 3: I believe it could be SHA-1 based on the encryption process described.
LI
Linn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noel
User 2: I'm not so sure, maybe it's FORK-256 since it involves further encryption and rearrangement.
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noel
User 1: I think the hash function you're referring to is SHA-256.
VI
Viva 2 years ago
Hmm, the 'preset constants' and 'four branches' make me think this might be FORK-256. Interesting twist on the usual hash function.
PA
Page 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
Yes, FORK-256 seems to match the unique features mentioned in the description.
SH
Shelba 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
I think you might be right, FORK-256 does sound like a good fit for the description.
LA
Launa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
D) RSA
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
C) SHA-1
VI
Vincenza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
B) FORK-256
RE
Remedios 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
A) SHA-256
BO
Boris 2 years ago
Sounds like SHA-256 to me. The 512-bit blocks and 256-bit output are a dead giveaway.
VE
Verona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
RSA doesn't match the description. It's definitely SHA-256.
TR
Tresa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
D) RSA
ME
Merri 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
Not SHA-1. The 512-bit blocks and 256-bit output point to SHA-256.
LE
Lelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
C) SHA-1
JA
Janae 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
No, it's not FORK-256. The description matches SHA-256.
LA
Larae 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
B) FORK-256
FR
Franklyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
Definitely SHA-256. It fits the description perfectly.
GE
Gerald 1 year ago
↳ replying to Boris
A) SHA-256
AM
Ammie 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think SHA-1 could also be a possibility.
JO
Joseph 2 years ago
I agree with Jettie, SHA-256 makes sense for the description given.
JE
Jettie 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) SHA-256.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel