New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil 212-81 Exam - Topic 5 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-81 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 5
[All 212-81 Questions]

Which algorithm implements an unbalanced Feistel cipher?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Public keys

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography

Public-key cryptography, or asymmetric cryptography, is a cryptographic system that uses pairs of keys: public keys, which may be disseminated widely, and private keys, which are known only to the owner. The generation of such keys depends on cryptographic algorithms based on mathematical problems to produce one-way functions. Effective security only requires keeping the private key private; the public key can be openly distributed without compromising security.

In such a system, any person can encrypt a message using the receiver's public key, but that encrypted message can only be decrypted with the receiver's private key.

Alice and Bob have two keys of their own --- just to be clear, that's four keys total. Each party has their own public key, which they share with the world, and their own private key which they well, which they keep private, of course but, more than that, which they keep as a closely guarded secret. The magic of public key cryptography is that a message encrypted with the public key can only be decrypted with the private key. Alice will encrypt her message with Bob's public key, and even though Eve knows she used Bob's public key, and even though Eve knows Bob's public key herself, she is unable to decrypt the message. Only Bob, using his secret key, can decrypt the message assuming he's kept it secret, of course.

Alice and Bob do not need to plan anything ahead of time to communicate securely: they generate their public-private key pairs independently, and happily broadcast their public keys to the world at large. Alice can rest assured that only Bob can decrypt the message she sends because she has encrypted it with his public key.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Carmela
3 months ago
Really? I thought Skipjack was more popular.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
3 months ago
Nope, Blowfish is the one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
3 months ago
Wait, isn't 3DES also a Feistel cipher?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
4 months ago
Pretty sure it's Blowfish!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards Blowfish since it’s known for its Feistel network, but I’m a bit confused about the unbalanced part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
4 months ago
Skipjack sounds familiar, but I can't remember if it fits the unbalanced Feistel definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
4 months ago
I practiced a question about Feistel ciphers, and I feel like 3DES was mentioned, but I don't recall it being unbalanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
5 months ago
I think I remember that Blowfish is related to Feistel structures, but I'm not entirely sure if it's unbalanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
I think Blowfish might be an unbalanced Feistel cipher, but I'm not 100% confident. I'll have to review my notes on this topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
Skipjack sounds like the right answer, but I want to double-check the details on unbalanced Feistel ciphers just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the different types of Feistel ciphers. I'll have to think this one through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure Skipjack is an unbalanced Feistel cipher, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
5 months ago
I feel confident that A. Contingent is the correct answer. The question is clearly asking about an event that is uncertain in its occurrence, which matches the definition of a contingent event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which Salesforce environment would be the best fit. I'll need to carefully consider the differences between Scratch org, Developer Edition, Full sandbox, and Partial Copy sandbox. Time to put on my problem-solving hat!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. The options seem pretty similar, so I want to make sure I understand the differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. Coke drums, steam soot blowers, and high-pressure steam piping all seem like they would be prone to thermal fatigue from the temperature swings. The welds with different expansion coefficients also seem like a prime candidate. I'm going to go with C - the mix points of hot and cold streams as the least likely to have issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
3DES? More like 3 times the headache! Skipjack all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
8 months ago
3DES can be a bit of a headache, I agree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
8 months ago
Blowfish is a solid choice as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
8 months ago
Blowfish is a solid choice as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
8 months ago
I prefer RSA for encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
8 months ago
I prefer RSA for my encryption needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
9 months ago
Skipjack is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
9 months ago
Skipjack is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
10 months ago
I heard Skipjack was developed by the NSA, so it must be secure, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
8 months ago
D) Blowfish is also a strong contender for implementing an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
8 months ago
C) 3DES is another option for implementing an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
9 months ago
A) Skipjack was developed by the NSA, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elliot
10 months ago
RSA is an asymmetric-key algorithm, so it's definitely not a Feistel cipher. I'm going with A, Skipjack.
upvoted 0 times
Glennis
9 months ago
Skipjack is the correct choice for an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
9 months ago
I think Skipjack is the right answer too. It's an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
10 months ago
I agree, RSA is not a Feistel cipher. Skipjack is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aide
10 months ago
Blowfish is a pretty popular symmetric-key algorithm, but I don't think it's a Feistel cipher. I'll have to go with A on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Solange
8 months ago
Yes, Skipjack is the algorithm that fits the description of an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
9 months ago
Skipjack is known for its unbalanced Feistel structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
10 months ago
I agree, Skipjack is the correct choice for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
10 months ago
I think Skipjack is the algorithm that implements an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Enola
10 months ago
Wait, isn't Skipjack an old NSA algorithm? I'm pretty sure it's an unbalanced Feistel cipher. Let's go with A.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
10 months ago
Let's go with option A then, Skipjack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
10 months ago
I think you're right, Skipjack is indeed an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kelvin
10 months ago
Hmm, I remember learning about Feistel ciphers in my cryptography class. Skipjack seems like the obvious choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
11 months ago
But Blowfish is known for implementing an unbalanced Feistel cipher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's A) Skipjack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
11 months ago
I think the answer is D) Blowfish.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel