Eccouncil Exam 212-81 Topic 11 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-81 exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 11

A 160-bit hash algorithm developed by Hans Dobbertin, Antoon Bosselaers, and Bart Preneel for which there are 128, 256 and 320-bit versions is called what?

ASHA1

BMD5

CFORK

DRIPEMD

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

RIPEMD

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIPEMD

RIPEMD (RIPE Message Digest) is a family of cryptographic hash functions developed in 1992 (the original RIPEMD) and 1996 (other variants). There are five functions in the family: RIPEMD, RIPEMD-128, RIPEMD-160, RIPEMD-256, and RIPEMD-320, of which RIPEMD-160 is the most common.

The original RIPEMD, as well as RIPEMD-128, is not considered secure because 128-bit result is too small and also (for the original RIPEMD) because of design weaknesses. The 256- and 320-bit versions of RIPEMD provide the same level of security as RIPEMD-128 and RIPEMD-160, respectively; they are designed for applications where the security level is sufficient but longer hash result is necessary.

by Louann at Sep 19, 2024, 04:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-81 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Madelyn

9 months ago

Dobbertin, Bosselaers, and Preneel... now that rings a bell. Definitely RIPEMD. Haha, FORK, really?

upvoted 0 times

Nakita

8 months ago

RIPEMD it is then!

upvoted 0 times

...

Michael

8 months ago

Definitely not FORK, that's for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamie

8 months ago

Yeah, Dobbertin, Bosselaers, and Preneel developed it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tambra

8 months ago

I think it's RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamera

9 months ago

FORK? What kind of hash algorithm is that? Sounds like it could be a typo or a joke option. I'm going with D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latia

9 months ago

I'm pretty sure it's not MD5, that's a different hash function. Let me think... D) RIPEMD, that's it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pete

9 months ago

RIPEMD? Really? I thought it was SHA1. Maybe I need to review my hash algorithms again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madalyn

9 months ago

Hmm, I remember learning about this in my cryptography class. I think the answer is D) RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

9 months ago

Ooh, RIPEMD? Is that like a new cryptocurrency or something?

upvoted 0 times

Madelyn

8 months ago

Bettina: Got it, thanks for clarifying!

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

8 months ago

Crista: Exactly, it's designed to produce a fixed-size hash value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crista

9 months ago

User 2: Oh, I see. So it's used for data integrity and security?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamera

9 months ago

No, RIPEMD is actually a hash algorithm, not a cryptocurrency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

9 months ago

Wait, isn't RIPEMD something you do when you've had too many ripe plums?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

9 months ago

Well, if it's a 160-bit hash algorithm, it's gotta be MD5, right? I mean, that's the classic!

upvoted 0 times

Nichelle

8 months ago

I remember learning about this in class, it's definitely RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micah

8 months ago

No, I'm pretty sure it's SHA1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verdell

9 months ago

I think you're mistaken, it's actually RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalind

9 months ago

RIPEMD? Really? That's so old school. I bet it's something fancy like FORK.

upvoted 0 times

Valene

9 months ago

I'm going with FORK for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

9 months ago

Yeah, RIPEMD does sound old school.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maia

9 months ago

I think FORK sounds fancy too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

10 months ago

Hmm, RIPEMD sounds familiar, but I'm going to go with SHA1 just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

Pete

8 months ago

I'm going to go with SHA1 as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

8 months ago

I'm not sure, but I'll choose RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

9 months ago

I'm going with SHA1 for this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

9 months ago

I think RIPEMD is a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nikita

10 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) FORK. Can someone explain why RIPEMD is the correct answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

10 months ago

I agree with Lavonda, RIPEMD makes sense for a 160-bit hash algorithm.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

10 months ago

RIPEMD, of course! I mean, who doesn't know that?

upvoted 0 times

Hollis

9 months ago

RIPEMD-320 is the most secure version.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantell

9 months ago

I think MD5 is more commonly used than RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

9 months ago

RIPEMD is a solid choice for hashing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kandis

9 months ago

I prefer SHA1 over RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

10 months ago

I think the answer is D) RIPEMD.

upvoted 0 times

...