Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Docker Exam DCA Topic 7 Question 91 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Barbra
2 months ago
Haha, this question is like asking if a single parachute can support an entire skydiving team. No way, Jose! B is the only sane answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
2 months ago
This is a classic case of 'too many cooks in the kitchen'. You need a balance, not just throwing more managers at the problem. B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Rose
20 days ago
B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
25 days ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
27 days ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franklyn
2 months ago
B all the way. Gotta have more managers to spread the load and keep things running smoothly. One's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
1 months ago
B all the way. Gotta have more managers to spread the load and keep things running smoothly. One's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronny
2 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Doesn't sound very robust to me. I'd want at least three manager nodes to handle failures properly.
upvoted 0 times
Yolando
15 days ago
Yes, I agree. Having at least three manager nodes would be a better configuration for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
16 days ago
I think we definitely need more manager nodes to achieve fault tolerance in the swarm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
20 days ago
I agree, having only one manager node for two worker nodes doesn't seem very reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
24 days ago
Yes, I also believe that having at least three manager nodes would be a better solution for handling failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
25 days ago
I think we definitely need more manager nodes to achieve fault tolerance in the swarm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
I agree, having only one manager node for two worker nodes doesn't seem very reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fidelia
2 months ago
I agree with Huey. Having one manager node for two worker nodes can provide fault tolerance by spreading the workload and reducing the chances of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
I think it could work. Having multiple worker nodes can help distribute the load and reduce the risk of a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
3 months ago
One manager node for two workers? That's like having one traffic cop for a whole highway intersection. Definitely a big no-no for fault tolerance!
upvoted 0 times
Jolanda
2 months ago
One manager node for two workers? That's like having one traffic cop for a whole highway intersection. Definitely a big no-no for fault tolerance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
2 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearline
3 months ago
I'm not sure. It might depend on the workload and the specific setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
3 months ago
Do you think one manager node for two worker nodes will achieve fault tolerance?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel