New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Docker DCA Exam - Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Docker's DCA exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 6
[All DCA Questions]

Your organization has a centralized logging solution, such as Splunk.

Will this configure a Docker container to export container logs to the logging solution?

Solution: Set the log-driver and log-oPt keys to values for the logging solution (Splunk) In the daemon.json file.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sarah at May 07, 2022, 04:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DCA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Emelda
4 months ago
No way, I’ve never seen that work before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
4 months ago
Wait, can you really do that just in daemon.json?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
4 months ago
I thought you needed to set it in the container itself?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
4 months ago
Totally agree, it works like a charm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
5 months ago
Yes, that's how you configure it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
5 months ago
I believe the answer is yes, but I wonder if there are additional steps to ensure the logs are properly formatted for Splunk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the specifics of the log-opt values. Do they vary for different logging solutions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
5 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to configure logging for Docker, and it involved similar settings. I feel like this could be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
I think setting the log-driver and log-opt in the daemon.json file is the right approach, but I'm not completely sure if that's all that's needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
5 months ago
Hmm, the key seems to be reducing the LTM device load without breaking the application. I'm thinking removing the HTTP compression profile and modifying the virtual server type to performance might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward procurement question. I'd go with option B - running a restricted competition and sending out a PQQ to prequalify suppliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
The key here is to focus on the "meaningful to the developer" part of the question. That makes me think option A is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the three domains that apply to both the controller and the processor, and consent management is not one of them. I'm going to go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel