Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Dell EMC D-XTR-DS-A-24 Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-XTR-DS-A-24 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All D-XTR-DS-A-24 Questions]

What is a benefit of XtremIO All Flash arrays?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

XtremIO All Flash arrays provide a significant benefit in terms of cost per I/O per GB when compared to traditional spinning disks. This is due to the higher performance and efficiency of flash storage, which delivers faster data access speeds and better I/O rates. As a result, the cost per I/O operation, when spread over the total capacity of the storage (GB), is lower for all-flash arrays. This efficiency translates into better overall value, especially for workloads that require high I/O throughput1.


It is a common understanding that all-flash arrays, like XtremIO, offer better performance and efficiency compared to spinning disks, which results in a lower cost per I/O per GB1.

The ''Introduction to XtremIO X2 Storage Array'' document from Dell Technologies highlights the efficiency of the storage array, which contributes to reducing the $/GB cost of storage2.

Additional data from industry sources supports the notion that all-flash storage can be more cost-effective in the long run due to operational cost reductions and lower total cost of ownership (TCO) over time1.

=========================

by Dong at Sep 17, 2024, 09:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-XTR-DS-A-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dorthy
6 months ago
Not sure about that, seems too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
6 months ago
Wait, is the cost per GB really the same as spinning disks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
6 months ago
Totally agree, D is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
7 months ago
I heard it's actually more expensive than spinning disks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
7 months ago
Cost per I/O per GB is definitely lower!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
7 months ago
I thought the benefit was more about performance than cost, but I guess if the cost per I/O is lower, that could be a big advantage too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
7 months ago
I vaguely recall that all-flash arrays generally have better performance, but I can't remember if that directly relates to cost per I/O.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
7 months ago
I think we practiced a question like this, and I feel like the answer might be D, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
8 months ago
I remember studying that XtremIO has a lower cost per I/O, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for GB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the benefits of XtremIO, so I'm guessing the answer has to do with the cost or performance advantages of this specific all-flash array. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem to fit and try to narrow it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know that all-flash arrays are generally more expensive than spinning disk, but I can't remember if the cost per GB or cost per I/O per GB is the main difference. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The key benefit of XtremIO All Flash arrays is that the cost per I/O per GB is lower than spinning disk, so I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
8 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. All-flash arrays like XtremIO are designed to provide higher performance than spinning disk, so the cost per I/O per GB would be lower. I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
2 years ago
Option D all the way! Lower cost per I/O per GB is music to my ears. It's like getting a Ferrari for the price of a Honda.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
2 years ago
I'm going with C. I mean, who needs lower cost per I/O per GB when you can have the same as spinning disk? That's a win-win!
upvoted 0 times
Tyisha
2 years ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 years ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
2 years ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
2 years ago
Option D, no doubt! With the cost per I/O per GB being lower, it's a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 years ago
D sounds great, but I'm a bit skeptical. Aren't all-flash arrays supposed to be more expensive than spinning disk?
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I think B might be the way to go, but I'll have to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
2 years ago
Option D all the way! Lower cost per I/O per GB is the real deal breaker here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 years ago
Option C looks good to me. I mean, if the cost per I/O is the same, then that's still a win, right? No need to break the bank.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
2 years ago
I'm going with Option D. Who doesn't love lower costs per I/O? It's like getting more bang for your buck!
upvoted 0 times
Stephen
2 years ago
Lower costs per I/O with XtremIO All Flash arrays? Count me in! Option D all the way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 years ago
I think I'll go with Option D too. It just makes sense to save on costs per I/O.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
2 years ago
I agree, it's like getting more value for your money. XtremIO All Flash arrays sound like a great investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
2 years ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. Lower costs per I/O are always a win!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
2 years ago
Option B seems more accurate to me. The cost per GB should be lower for all-flash storage than traditional spinning disks.
upvoted 0 times
Eliz
2 years ago
Yes, all-flash arrays are known for their cost efficiency. Option B is definitely the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
2 years ago
I agree, option B is correct. All-flash arrays typically have a lower cost per GB compared to spinning disks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tish
2 years ago
I believe the correct answer is D) Cost per I/O per GB is lower than spinning disk, which makes XtremIO All Flash arrays a cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
2 years ago
I agree with Cherry, lower cost per GB means better value for money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
2 years ago
I think the benefit of XtremIO All Flash arrays is that cost per GB is lower than spinning disk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
2 years ago
Option D is the correct answer. The cost per I/O per GB is lower for XtremIO All Flash arrays compared to spinning disk.
upvoted 0 times
Leonard
2 years ago
Yes, it's a significant benefit for organizations looking to improve performance and reduce costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
2 years ago
That's great to know! It means XtremIO All Flash arrays are more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
2 years ago
Option D is correct. The cost per I/O per GB is lower for XtremIO All Flash arrays compared to spinning disk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel