Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC Exam D-UN-DY-23 Topic 9 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-UN-DY-23 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 9
[All D-UN-DY-23 Questions]

A company has an ESXi host installed with FC HBAs that is connected to a Dell Unity XT storage array. A 500 GB LUN is provisioned to this host from the Unity array and is in production. The VMware administrator has configured a new vSwitch with the NICs on the server intended for iSCSI traffic. The storage administrator is asked to configure software iSCSI and provision a new 1 TB LUN from the storage array using iSCSI.

What is a consideration when satisfying this request?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Trina
26 days ago
Ah, the age-old question of FC vs. iSCSI. It's like the battle of the storage protocols - may the best one win! Or maybe they can just hold hands and share the storage, who knows?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
27 days ago
I'm going with B. Mixing protocols is like trying to speak French and Spanish at the same time - it's just gonna end in a linguistic disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Audry
16 days ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
19 days ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
20 days ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scot
1 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Gotta establish that connection first before you can provision the new LUN. Otherwise, it's just not gonna work, right?
upvoted 0 times
Matthew
21 days ago
A: Option C is definitely important. You need that connection in place before adding a new LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irving
1 months ago
Wait, so we have FC HBAs already connected to the storage array, and now we want to set up iSCSI as well? That sounds a bit overkill, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Lilli
21 hours ago
B: Two iSCSI target interfaces must be configured with IP addresses from separate subnets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
9 days ago
A: A connection must be established between the host iSCSI initiators and Unity iSCSI targets before provisioning the new LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keva
1 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option C might be the correct answer because establishing a connection between the host initiators and Unity targets seems like a necessary step before provisioning the new LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
2 months ago
I agree with Lelia. Having separate subnets for the iSCSI target interfaces ensures better network segmentation and avoids any potential issues with routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Using only one protocol per host is a best practice to simplify management and troubleshooting.
upvoted 0 times
Bev
10 days ago
But wouldn't it be better to establish the connection first before provisioning the new LUN?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
29 days ago
I agree, using one protocol per host can definitely simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lelia
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Two iSCSI target interfaces must be configured with IP addresses from separate subnets to avoid any network conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option C might be important too, as establishing a connection between the host initiators and Unity targets seems crucial before provisioning the new LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
2 months ago
I agree with Rutha. Option A makes sense in this scenario to ensure proper network configuration and avoid any potential conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer because having separate subnets for the iSCSI target interfaces can help with network segregation and performance optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel