New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Dell EMC D-RP-OE-A-24 Exam - Topic 2 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-RP-OE-A-24 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 2
[All D-RP-OE-A-24 Questions]

A storage administrator has one production site and one remote site. The administrator configured the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) cluster at both sites. The current environment

has two Consistency Groups configured with two copies each; one production copy and one remote copy. Based on the company's growing business requirements, the

administrator has been asked to keep a local copy of the production data.

Which action should occur in order to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To meet the requirement of keeping a local copy of the production data in a RecoverPoint environment with VNX(SE) clusters, the administrator can add a local copy into the existing Consistency Group. This action does not require deleting and reconfiguring the existing Consistency Group or upgrading the license. Here are the steps:

Access Unisphere for RecoverPoint: Log into the Unisphere interface for RecoverPoint management.

Navigate to the Consistency Group: Find the Consistency Group that needs the local copy.

Add a Local Copy: Use the option to add a copy into the selected Consistency Group.

Configure the Local Copy: Specify the settings for the local copy, such as the Journal volume and RPO settings.

Apply Changes: Save the changes to implement the local replication.

This process allows the administrator to enhance the data protection strategy by adding a local copy for operational recovery or other business needs without disrupting the existing remote replication setup1.


by Glory at Aug 27, 2024, 06:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-RP-OE-A-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stephen
3 months ago
No way, D sounds too complicated for this situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
3 months ago
I think C might work too, but not sure if it’s the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
4 months ago
Wait, can you really upgrade to RecoverPoint/EX? That’s new to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
4 months ago
Totally agree, B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
4 months ago
A is correct, you can't have more than two copies in a Consistency Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
4 months ago
Upgrading the license sounds familiar, but I’m uncertain if that’s necessary just to add a local copy. I wish I had reviewed that section more thoroughly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
5 months ago
I feel like adding a copy to the existing Consistency Group could work, but I can't recall if there are specific restrictions with that setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
5 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where we had to decide whether to delete and reconfigure a Consistency Group. That might be the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
I remember something about the limitations of Consistency Groups, but I'm not sure if it was specifically about the number of copies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
5 months ago
Ah, I see. The question mentions the company's growing business requirements, so we need to upgrade the license to RecoverPoint/EX to support more than two copies. Option D seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is to delete and reconfigure the existing Consistency Group for a local and remote replication, so I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Doesn't the question say the current setup has two copies already? How can we add a third one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the details and options to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to add a local copy to the existing Consistency Group, so I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
5 months ago
Wait, I'm not sure about that. I think we need to consider the fees and other costs associated with each option to get the true effective rate. This isn't as straightforward as it seems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the benefits of using Okta for IAM. I'll focus on highlighting the key points from the solution, like the ability to securely connect users to apps and the wide range of integrations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
1 year ago
Personally, I'd go with Option C. Adding a copy sounds like the easiest and most straightforward solution. Plus, who doesn't love a little light data replication? It's like storage admin speed dating!
upvoted 0 times
Keena
1 year ago
It's like a storage admin speed dating, just adding a little local data replication!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 year ago
Definitely, adding a copy for local replication would be the most efficient way to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 year ago
I agree, it would be much easier than deleting and reconfiguring the Consistency Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. Adding a local copy seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Staci
1 year ago
Option A really throws me off. I mean, if RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) can't handle more than two copies, why are they even asking this question? Talk about a head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
Ah, the old 'delete and reconfigure' solution. Classic! But hey, if it works, it works, right? Gotta love the 'if it ain't broke, break it' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnna
1 year ago
C: I guess it's the best way to ensure everything is set up correctly for the new requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
B: Totally, it's like hitting the reset button and starting over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
A: Yeah, sometimes you just gotta start fresh with a clean slate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. What if the existing setup can't handle the extra copy? Might be better to look into upgrading the license, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
1 year ago
That sounds like a safer option. It's better to upgrade the license to ensure everything runs smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
Maybe we should consider upgrading the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 year ago
That could work, but what if the existing setup can't handle the extra copy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 year ago
I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
1 year ago
I agree with Nichelle, adding a copy for local replication seems like a more practical solution for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
1 year ago
That could be an option too, but I believe adding a copy for local replication might be a quicker solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
1 year ago
Option C seems like the obvious choice here. Why delete and reconfigure when you can just add another copy? Keeps things simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Talia
1 year ago
I agree, it's much simpler than deleting and reconfiguring the Consistency Group. Option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Adding a copy for local replication is the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Silva
2 years ago
But wouldn't it be better to upgrade the license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
2 years ago
I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel