Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC D-PST-OE-23 Exam - Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-PST-OE-23 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 2
[All D-PST-OE-23 Questions]

A Storage Administrator has an existing single appliance Dell PowerStore 3000T cluster. An additional PowerStore 9000T has been purchased to add into the existing cluster.

How does the administrator proceed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elfrieda
2 days ago
Wait, D can't be right, can it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
7 days ago
C seems off, why remove drives?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
12 days ago
I think A is also important for network load.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
18 days ago
B is the way to go, mixed models are supported!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
23 days ago
Option B) is the way to go. Keep it simple, just add the new appliance and let the cluster handle the rest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
28 days ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option C) has never actually worked with a PowerStore cluster before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
2 months ago
C) is just weird. Why would I need to remove drives from the new appliance? That doesn't make any sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
2 months ago
D) can't be right. I'm pretty sure mixed models are supported in the same cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
2 months ago
A) sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. Why would I need to configure additional VLTi links just to add a new appliance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
B) is the correct answer. The administrator can simply add the new 9000T appliance into the existing cluster per the procedure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
2 months ago
I’m pretty sure D is incorrect because I remember discussing how different models can work together, so that rules it out for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
3 months ago
I feel like I read that the caching configuration needs to match, which makes me lean towards C, but it seems a bit extreme to remove drives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
3 months ago
I recall something about needing to configure additional links for load balancing, so A could be a consideration, but I don't think it's the main step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
3 months ago
I'm a little unsure about option A. The question mentions something about increased inter-switch network load, but I'm not sure if that's something we need to worry about in this case. I'll have to think about that one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B as well. The question seems to be pretty straightforward, and the instructions say that mixed models of the same type are supported, so I don't think we need to do anything special to add the new appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
3 months ago
Okay, I'm pretty confident that option C is not correct. The question says the caching configuration of all clustered appliances must match, so removing drives from the 9000T doesn't seem like the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions something about configuring VLTi links on the ToR switching, but I'm not sure what that means. I'll have to look that up before I can decide on the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
4 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Mixed models are supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
4 months ago
I think the answer might be B since I remember mixed models can be supported in clusters, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
4 months ago
I think option B is the way to go here. The question says that mixed models of the same type are supported, so I don't think we need to worry about the different models.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel