Dell EMC D-PSC-MN-01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-PSC-MN-01 exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 1

[All D-PSC-MN-01 Questions]

What is done with the components when a Gen6 single node is replaced?

ATransferred to the new node

BReturned to Dell

CSent to WWFA

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Tenant-specific administration involves managing specific zones or tenants within a Dell EMC PowerScale environment. This requires a certain level of privileges that allows administrators to control resources without having full system-wide access.

Zone Role-Based Access Control:

Definition:

Zone role-based access control allows administrators to assign permissions to users or groups for specific zones or tenants.

Functionality:

Enables delegation of administrative tasks within a particular zone without granting system-wide privileges.

Benefits:

Enhances security by limiting access.

Simplifies management in multi-tenant environments.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

System Root Privileges (Option B):

Root privileges grant full access to the entire system, which is not necessary for tenant-specific tasks.

System Admin Privileges (Option C):

Similar to root, system admin privileges are broader than needed.

Role-Based Access Control (Option D):

While general role-based access control is related, zone role-based access control is specifically designed for tenant administration.

Dell PowerScale Reference:

Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS Administration Guide:

Chapter on Access Control and Authentication:

Details how to implement zone role-based access control.

Provides instructions on assigning roles to users within specific zones.

Best Practices:

Regularly review and update access permissions.

Use the principle of least privilege to enhance security.

by Arlie at Mar 19, 2025, 04:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-PSC-MN-01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Val

7 months ago

Definitely returned to Dell, that's standard practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellen

7 months ago

I thought they were sent to WWFA instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Queen

7 months ago

Wait, really? I didn't know they went back to Dell!

upvoted 0 times

...

Karan

8 months ago

Yeah, returning to Dell makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirk

8 months ago

Components are usually returned to Dell.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thora

8 months ago

I’m uncertain, but I think it might depend on the warranty status of the components when replacing a Gen6 node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothea

8 months ago

I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and it was about sending components to WWFA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hannah

8 months ago

I remember something about returning parts to Dell, but I can't recall if that's the standard procedure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mari

9 months ago

I think the components are usually transferred to the new node, but I'm not completely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ma

9 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The options seem clear, and I think I remember learning about the process of replacing a node in my studies. I'll mark my answer and move on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

9 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll read through the question and answers slowly, and try to picture the process of replacing a Gen6 node. That should help me figure out the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wava

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully and see if I can eliminate any of the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karol

9 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward, I think I know the answer but I'll double-check the options just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

1 year ago

Wait, WWFA? Is that some sort of secret society for retired computer parts? I'm going with A, the straightforward option.

upvoted 0 times

Ettie

1 year ago

Definitely. It's important to make the most out of the existing resources.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catrice

1 year ago

That makes sense. It's probably more cost-effective to reuse the components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

1 year ago

Yeah, I agree. I think the components are transferred to the new node when a Gen6 single node is replaced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

1 year ago

I think WWFA stands for Worldwide Forwarding Agency, not a secret society.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rusty

1 year ago

B and C just sound like a waste of time and resources. A is the way to go - transfer those components and keep things moving!

upvoted 0 times

Earleen

1 year ago

C) Sent to WWFA

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

1 year ago

I agree, transferring the components is the most efficient option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Na

1 year ago

A) Transferred to the new node

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

1 year ago

Haha, I bet the WWFA stands for 'Weird Warehouse for Abandoned' components. But seriously, A is the only logical answer here.

upvoted 0 times

Latricia

1 year ago

Definitely, it makes sense to transfer them to the new node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettyann

1 year ago

I agree, A is the most practical option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

1 year ago

C) Sent to WWFA

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

1 year ago

B) Returned to Dell

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiley

1 year ago

A) Transferred to the new node

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

1 year ago

Hmm, I think the correct answer is A. Why would I want to send the components back to Dell or some random WWFA place? Just transfer them to the new node and get on with it!

upvoted 0 times