Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC D-NWG-FN-23 Exam - Topic 6 Question 45 Discussion

A customer reports they can no longer access their services and a network administrator has been assigned to investigate. A UFD disabled error status appears on all ports. What caused the issue?
A) Spanning tree Loop-guard was implemented on the uplink-state group.
B) One of the upstream interfaces is an uplink-state group went down.
C) There was no issue; this is normal behavior.
D) Both a port channel and its members were assigned to an uplink-state group.

Dell EMC D-NWG-FN-23 Exam - Topic 6 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-NWG-FN-23 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 6
[All D-NWG-FN-23 Questions]

A customer reports they can no longer access their services and a network administrator has been assigned to investigate. A UFD disabled error status appears on all ports. What caused the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Erin
3 days ago
D could be the issue as well. Port channels can complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
8 days ago
C is possible too. Sometimes it’s just normal behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
13 days ago
I agree, B seems likely. UFD disabled is a clear sign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
18 days ago
I think it's B. An upstream interface going down makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
23 days ago
D is interesting. Port channels can cause issues if not configured right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
28 days ago
C seems unlikely. This error isn't normal behavior at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 month ago
I feel like A could be the cause too. Loop-guard can mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
1 month ago
I think it's B. An upstream interface going down makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 month ago
D could be the issue as well. Port channels can cause confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
2 months ago
C is a possibility too. Sometimes it’s just normal behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
I agree, B seems likely. UFD errors usually point to that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
2 months ago
I think it's B. An upstream interface going down makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
2 months ago
Loop-guard shouldn't cause a UFD disabled error, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
2 months ago
I agree with B, but I'm curious about A too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
4 months ago
Wait, is option C really a thing? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
4 months ago
I think it's definitely option D, that can cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
4 months ago
Sounds like option B to me, an interface must've gone down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
4 months ago
Loop-guard can definitely mess things up, so A could be a factor too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
5 months ago
Wait, is option C really a thing? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I’ve seen this before, it’s definitely not normal behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
5 months ago
I disagree, I think it’s option D. That setup can cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
5 months ago
Sounds like option B to me. An interface probably went down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
I think option D makes sense because if both a port channel and its members are in the same group, it could cause issues. But I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
5 months ago
I feel like I read somewhere that UFD disabled can sometimes be normal behavior, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
6 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did on spanning tree protocols. I think option B could be the right answer if an interface went down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
6 months ago
I remember studying about uplink-state groups, but I'm not entirely sure how they relate to the UFD disabled error.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel