Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Dell EMC Exam D-NWG-FN-23 Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-NWG-FN-23 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3
[All D-NWG-FN-23 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

No static routing has been configured. For iBGP loopback-based peering, which statement is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rusty at Sep 16, 2024, 07:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-NWG-FN-23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Gilma
9 months ago
Option C is just plain wrong. Everyone knows iBGP peering uses loopback addresses, not physical interfaces. What a silly choice!
upvoted 0 times
Lyndia
8 months ago
C) For iBGP peering, physical interface addresses must be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
9 months ago
B) S1 should have the Loopback network of S3 in its routing table for loopback-based peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
9 months ago
A) It is not necessary for the routing table on S1 to have an entry for the loopback network of S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ludivina
9 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is a network troll. They're trying to confuse us with all these options!
upvoted 0 times
Reid
8 months ago
User 3: I agree with Reiko, having the Loopback network of S3 in S1's routing table makes sense for iBGP peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
9 months ago
No, I believe option A is right. It's not necessary for S1 to have an entry for S3's loopback network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
9 months ago
I think option B is correct, S1 needs the Loopback network of S3 in its routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamar
10 months ago
It's a trick question! The correct answer is D. A static route on S1 to the loopback of S3 will eliminate the need for loopback-based peering.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
9 months ago
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
9 months ago
Actually, the correct answer is D) A static route on S1 to 144.254.32.1/32 will eliminate the need for loopback-based peering with S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
9 months ago
No, I believe the correct answer is B) S1 should have the Loopback network of S3 in its routing table for loopback-based peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
9 months ago
I think the answer is A) It is not necessary for the routing table on S1 to have an entry for the loopback network of S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darell
10 months ago
But having the Loopback network of S3 in the routing table would ensure proper communication between the devices, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
10 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The routing table on S1 needs to have an entry for the loopback network of S3 for iBGP loopback-based peering to work.
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
9 months ago
Yes, option B is the most logical choice. It ensures proper connectivity between the loopback interfaces of S1 and S3 for iBGP peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
10 months ago
That makes sense. Having the loopback network of S3 in the routing table of S1 is essential for iBGP loopback-based peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
10 months ago
I agree with you, option B is the correct answer. S1 should have the Loopback network of S3 in its routing table for loopback-based peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gianna
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is correct. It is not necessary for the routing table on S1 to have an entry for the loopback network of S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
10 months ago
I think option B is correct. S1 needs to have the Loopback network of S3 in its routing table for loopback-based peering.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel