New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC D-MSS-DS-23 Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-MSS-DS-23 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 1
[All D-MSS-DS-23 Questions]

A customer has a PowerStore 3200T system with only base enclosure consisting of 15 SSD 1920 GB drives and wants to expand the available capacity. What is the most cost-effective drive addition from a raw and usable capacity perspective to achieve the result wanted by the customer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Adding 6 x 3840 GB NVMe SSD drives is the most cost-effective way to expand the capacity of a PowerStore 3200T system. This addition provides a significant increase in both raw and usable capacity, offering a better balance of performance and cost compared to smaller or more expensive drive options.


Dell EMC PowerStore Specification Sheet.

Dell EMC PowerStore Configuration Guide.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Casandra
3 months ago
6 x 1920 drives? That's just not enough for expansion!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
3 months ago
Wait, are 750 GB drives really worth it? Seems small!
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
3 months ago
I think option C might be a better deal for performance though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
4 months ago
Totally agree, bigger drives are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
4 months ago
Option B gives the best usable capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the trade-offs between raw and usable capacity. I think the 3840 drives could be a good choice, but I need to double-check the costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards the 6 x 750 GB SCM drives since they might be cheaper, but I’m not confident if they provide enough usable capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like the 1920 GB drives could be a safer bet for maximizing raw capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
5 months ago
I think the 6 x 3840 NVMe SSD drives might offer the best usable capacity, but I'm not entirely sure about the cost-effectiveness part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
5 months ago
This is a classic storage optimization problem. I'd start by calculating the raw and usable capacity for each option, then compare the cost-per-GB to determine the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the terminology here. What's the difference between NVMe SSD and NVMe SCM drives? I'll need to research that before I can confidently answer this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to maximize the usable capacity while minimizing the cost. Based on the information provided, option B with the 3840 GB NVMe drives seems like the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the drive types mentioned. I'll need to review the specifications to understand the tradeoffs between raw and usable capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward capacity expansion question. I'd start by looking at the current configuration and the available drive options to determine the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is somewhere between 'more is better' and 'less is more'. Hmm, maybe I should just stick to my day job.
upvoted 0 times
Kimberely
11 months ago
C: Yes, the SCM drives could be a more efficient option for expanding the available capacity in the PowerStore 3200T system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
11 months ago
A: Hmm, that's a good point. Maybe the SCM drives would be the better choice after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
11 months ago
B: Actually, I believe adding 6 x 750 GB NVMe SCM drives would provide the best result in terms of raw and usable capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
11 months ago
A: I think adding 6 x 3840 NVMe SSD drives would be the most cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angelyn
12 months ago
Well, if the customer wants to really go all out, they could just buy a 'Godzilla-sized' 6 x 3840 NVMe SSD drives and show off their deep pockets!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
12 months ago
Hold up, what about the 6 x 750 GB NVMe SCM drives? That could be a good compromise between cost and capacity, plus you get the performance benefits of SCM technology.
upvoted 0 times
Eugene
11 months ago
C) 6 x 750 GB NVMe SCM drives
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
11 months ago
A) 6 x 1920 NVMe SSD drives
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenda
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. The 6 x 3840 NVMe SSD drives might be a better fit if the customer wants to maximize the available capacity, even if it's a bit more expensive.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
12 months ago
The 6 x 3840 NVMe SSD drives might be more expensive, but they will provide the most usable capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
12 months ago
I think the 6 x 3840 NVMe SSD drives would be the best option for maximizing capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
1 year ago
I prefer option C for a balance between cost and capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B would provide more usable capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
1 year ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
Hmm, 6 x 1920 NVMe SSD drives seem like the obvious choice here. It's the most cost-effective option in terms of raw and usable capacity.
upvoted 0 times
Oren
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, it's the most cost-effective option for expanding capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 year ago
User 1: I think 6 x 1920 NVMe SSD drives is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel