MENU
Query History provides Databricks SQL users with a lot of benefits. A data analyst has been asked to share all of these benefits with their team as part of a training exercise. One of the benefit statements the analyst provided to their team is incorrect.
Which statement about Query History is incorrect?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium Databricks Certified Data Analyst Associate Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Query History in Databricks SQL is intended for reviewing executed queries, understanding their execution plans, and identifying performance issues or errors for debugging purposes. It allows users to analyze query duration, resources used, and potential bottlenecks. However, Query History does not provide any capability to automate the execution of queries across multiple warehouses; automation must be handled through jobs or external orchestration tools, not through the Query History feature itself.
20 comments · newest first
BE
Beula
10 months ago
I’m not sure about that automation part, seems a bit misleading.
RA
Rachael
10 months ago
I think it can help debug queries too.
ME
Merissa
10 months ago
Wait, can it really automate query execution? That sounds off.
LU
Lucille
10 months ago
Totally agree, troubleshooting slow queries is a big plus!
SH
Shonda
11 months ago
Query History definitely shows the query plan!
ST
Stephen
11 months ago
I vaguely recall something about Query History not being able to automate tasks, so I might lean towards option C being the incorrect one.
RY
Ryan
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think Query History can help with debugging and troubleshooting, so B and D seem right to me.
FL
Florinda
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like automating query execution isn't something Query History does. That might be option C?
LA
Launa
11 months ago
I remember that Query History is definitely useful for viewing query plans, so I think option A is correct.
LE
Leslee
12 months ago
I think I've got this one. Option C about automating query execution across warehouses doesn't sound like a standard feature of Query History. The other options all seem to accurately describe the capabilities of Query History. I'll go with C as the incorrect statement.
AU
Audry
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. Option A about viewing the query plan seems correct. Option B about debugging queries also sounds right. Option C about automating query execution across warehouses is new to me, but it seems plausible. Option D about troubleshooting slow queries is definitely a benefit. I'm a bit stumped on which one is incorrect.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all sound like valid benefits of Query History, so it's not immediately clear which one is incorrect. I'll need to think this through carefully.
LA
Laurena
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the benefits of Query History in Databricks SQL. I'll carefully review each option and think about which one is likely incorrect.
WE
Weldon
1 year ago
I agree with Kassandra, statement C seems incorrect.
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
I'm going with option C as the incorrect statement. Query History is great, but it's not a magical tool that can do everything. Let's keep our expectations realistic, shall we?
KA
Kassandra
1 year ago
I think the incorrect statement is C.
RE
Rene
1 year ago
Option C is the odd one out here. Query History is for viewing and debugging queries, not automating them across different warehouses. Gotta keep it simple, folks.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
Haha, option C is a good one. I bet the person who wrote that was just trying to sound fancy and impress the team. Nice try, but no cigar!
AS
Ashanti
1 year ago
Definitely option C. I mean, who would think Query History can do that? Sounds more like a job for a scheduler or workflow tool, not Query History.
CR
Cristy
1 year ago
I think option C is incorrect. Query History can't be used to automate query execution on multiple warehouses. That's just nonsense.