MENU
A customer requires high availability in its AWS cloud infrastructure.
What is the minimally viable Conjur deployment architecture to achieve this?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium SECRET-SEN Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
BE
Bernardo
11 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize load balancing was so crucial for availability!
YO
Yoko
11 months ago
I thought we needed more than one in each AZ for true redundancy?
CA
Carman
11 months ago
Wait, why not just go with option B? Seems simpler.
AP
Apolonia
11 months ago
I agree, two Followers in each AZ makes sense!
FR
Frederica
11 months ago
Option C is the best choice for high availability.
CA
Carlene
12 months ago
I recall that high availability often requires redundancy, so I think C makes sense with two Followers in each AZ, but I could be mixing it up with another question.
JO
Jolanda
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards A because it mentions having a load balancer for the region, but I’m not confident if just one Follower in each AZ is sufficient for high availability.
GR
Grover
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about load balancing in AWS, and I feel like having two Followers in each region could be enough, so maybe B is the right choice.
JO
Johnson
1 year ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure if two Followers in each AZ is really necessary for high availability.
NG
Ngoc
1 year ago
I've got this! The answer is clearly option B. Two Followers in each region, load balanced for the region. That's the most redundant and scalable solution to meet the high availability requirement. I'm confident this is the right approach.
BI
Billi
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know high availability is important, but I'm not sure if having two Followers in each AZ or region is the right approach. I'll need to review the Conjur documentation to understand the trade-offs better.
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking for the minimally viable Conjur deployment architecture to achieve high availability. I think the key is to have redundancy in case of failures, so I'm leaning towards option C or D.
RO
Roxane
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly. High availability is key, so I'll need to think through the different Conjur deployment options carefully.
SH
Shawnna
2 years ago
I'm feeling a bit like a Follower myself after reading these options. But hey, at least I know where to find the high-availability party - it's in Option C, baby!
GE
Geoffrey
2 years ago
Let's go with Option C then, it's the best choice for high availability.
BE
Beatriz
2 years ago
Definitely, that setup should ensure minimal downtime for the customer.
CR
Craig
2 years ago
Yeah, having two Followers in each AZ and load balancing for the region seems solid.
TO
Tom
2 years ago
Option C sounds like the way to go for high availability.
AA
Aaron
2 years ago
Option C all the way! Gotta love that load-balanced AZ architecture. It's like having a backup for your backup's backup. Redundancy is the name of the game, folks!
SY
Sylvie
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems a bit too simple, and Option B and D might be overkill. I think Option C strikes the right balance between reliability and complexity.
IZ
Izetta
2 years ago
I'd go with Option D. Having two Followers in each region, load balanced across all regions, seems like the most robust and scalable solution for high availability.
LO
Lore
2 years ago
I agree, having two Followers in each region, load balanced across all regions, provides a strong level of redundancy.
KA
Karl
2 years ago
Option D sounds like the best choice for high availability.
RU
Ruth
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think having two Followers in each AZ, load balanced for the region, could also work for high availability.
JA
Jacquline
2 years ago
I agree with Margarita, having two Followers in each region provides redundancy and load balancing for high availability.
LA
Lashaunda
2 years ago
Option C looks good to me. Having two Followers in each AZ with a load balancer for the region seems like the most reliable setup to ensure high availability.
EL
Elmira
2 years ago
It's important to have a setup that can handle failures and maintain availability, so option C with two Followers in each AZ is a solid choice.
RE
Rebecka
2 years ago
Having multiple Followers in each AZ and load balancing for the region definitely increases the reliability of the Conjur deployment.
KA
Karol
2 years ago
Option C seems like the best choice for ensuring the customer's AWS cloud infrastructure has high availability.
LI
Lindsay
2 years ago
I agree, having two Followers in each AZ with a load balancer for the region provides redundancy and high availability.
MA
Margarita
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) two Followers in each region, load balanced for the region.