New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk SECRET-SEN Exam - Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's SECRET-SEN exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 3
[All SECRET-SEN Questions]

A customer requires high availability in its AWS cloud infrastructure.

What is the minimally viable Conjur deployment architecture to achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elfrieda at Feb 08, 2025, 02:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SECRET-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bernardo
3 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize load balancing was so crucial for availability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
3 months ago
I thought we needed more than one in each AZ for true redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
3 months ago
Wait, why not just go with option B? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
4 months ago
I agree, two Followers in each AZ makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
4 months ago
Option C is the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
4 months ago
I recall that high availability often requires redundancy, so I think C makes sense with two Followers in each AZ, but I could be mixing it up with another question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards A because it mentions having a load balancer for the region, but I’m not confident if just one Follower in each AZ is sufficient for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about load balancing in AWS, and I feel like having two Followers in each region could be enough, so maybe B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
5 months ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure if two Followers in each AZ is really necessary for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
5 months ago
I've got this! The answer is clearly option B. Two Followers in each region, load balanced for the region. That's the most redundant and scalable solution to meet the high availability requirement. I'm confident this is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know high availability is important, but I'm not sure if having two Followers in each AZ or region is the right approach. I'll need to review the Conjur documentation to understand the trade-offs better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking for the minimally viable Conjur deployment architecture to achieve high availability. I think the key is to have redundancy in case of failures, so I'm leaning towards option C or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly. High availability is key, so I'll need to think through the different Conjur deployment options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
12 months ago
I'm feeling a bit like a Follower myself after reading these options. But hey, at least I know where to find the high-availability party - it's in Option C, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Geoffrey
11 months ago
Let's go with Option C then, it's the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
11 months ago
Definitely, that setup should ensure minimal downtime for the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
11 months ago
Yeah, having two Followers in each AZ and load balancing for the region seems solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
11 months ago
Option C sounds like the way to go for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aaron
12 months ago
Option C all the way! Gotta love that load-balanced AZ architecture. It's like having a backup for your backup's backup. Redundancy is the name of the game, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems a bit too simple, and Option B and D might be overkill. I think Option C strikes the right balance between reliability and complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
12 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Having two Followers in each region, load balanced across all regions, seems like the most robust and scalable solution for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Lore
11 months ago
I agree, having two Followers in each region, load balanced across all regions, provides a strong level of redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
11 months ago
Option D sounds like the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruth
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think having two Followers in each AZ, load balanced for the region, could also work for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
1 year ago
I agree with Margarita, having two Followers in each region provides redundancy and load balancing for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. Having two Followers in each AZ with a load balancer for the region seems like the most reliable setup to ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Elmira
11 months ago
It's important to have a setup that can handle failures and maintain availability, so option C with two Followers in each AZ is a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
11 months ago
Having multiple Followers in each AZ and load balancing for the region definitely increases the reliability of the Conjur deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
12 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice for ensuring the customer's AWS cloud infrastructure has high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
12 months ago
I agree, having two Followers in each AZ with a load balancer for the region provides redundancy and high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margarita
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) two Followers in each region, load balanced for the region.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel