A customer wants to minimize the Kubernetes application code developers must change to adopt Conjur for secrets access.Which solutions can meet this requirement? (Choose two.)
This is a straightforward question, in my opinion. A and D are clearly the best solutions to minimize code changes when adopting Conjur. The other options don't seem as relevant to the stated requirement.
I'm a bit confused by some of these options. Can anyone explain the differences between the Secrets Provider and Application Server Credential Provider approaches? I want to make sure I understand them properly.
Okay, I think I've got it. A and B are the way to go here. The Secrets Provider and Secretless approaches should allow us to integrate Conjur with minimal code changes.
Hmm, the key here seems to be minimizing changes to the Kubernetes application code. I'm leaning towards options A and D, but I'll double-check the details to be sure.
Changes in assigned resources, technical solutions, and status reporting - those all sound like they could potentially require a change request, but I'm not sure which one is the definitive answer here. I'll have to think it through.
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. The diagram shows the 10.1.1.0/24 network, but the question is asking about routing to 192.168.1.0/24. I'll need to double-check the network topology to make sure I understand this correctly.
Dana
8 months agoHyun
9 months agoBrandon
9 months agoRory
9 months agoYoko
9 months agoDustin
10 months agoAdell
10 months agoAdolph
10 months agoLucy
10 months agoLucille
10 months agoAnnita
10 months agoDomingo
10 months agoNickie
10 months agoGlory
10 months agoRyan
10 months agoLatricia
11 months agoGeoffrey
2 years agoRyann
2 years agoRupert
2 years agoLai
2 years agoParis
2 years agoFlo
2 years agoAnnamae
2 years agoThea
2 years agoZana
2 years agoHolley
2 years agoAlmeta
2 years ago