A customer has five main data centers with one PVWA in each center under different URLs.
How can you make this setup fault tolerant?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
PH
Phil
11 months ago
I'm surprised this setup isn't already considered fault tolerant.
LI
Lisha
11 months ago
Load balancing (option D) could really help with traffic too!
JE
Jerilyn
11 months ago
Wait, isn't this setup already fault tolerant?
GL
Gladis
11 months ago
Disagree, option C seems more practical for real-time issues.
TR
Tran
12 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. More PVWAs = better redundancy.
KI
Kimberely
12 months ago
Load balancing under the same URL seems like a good idea, but I can't recall if that would actually improve fault tolerance.
EA
Earlean
1 year ago
Option C sounds interesting, but I wonder if continuously monitoring is practical. Wouldn't that just create more overhead?
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
I think I saw a similar question where adding more PVWAs was suggested for redundancy. Maybe option B is the right choice?
DE
Destiny
1 year ago
I remember studying about fault tolerance, but I'm not sure if just having one PVWA in each center is enough.
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
Option D looks promising to me. Load balancing the PVWAs under a single URL could be an effective way to distribute the load and provide redundancy.
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I'm leaning towards option C - continuously monitoring the PVWA status and redirecting users to another instance if needed. That seems like a good way to maintain availability.
DA
Daron
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think the key is to identify the most reliable and efficient way to ensure the PVWAs are fault-tolerant.
RO
Ronna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully to determine the best approach.
DO
Dottie
1 year ago
Restoring the bootable image of the system drive could work, but I'm not sure if that would preserve the other volumes. I'll have to think this through.
AY
Ayesha
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. The NTP client is responsible for keeping the system clock in sync with a reference clock, so the answer is probably related to that. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem relevant.
HE
Hester
2 years ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I'm going to have to go with D, but I can't help but wonder if there's some hidden catch here. Maybe the answer is to just blow up all the data centers and start over from scratch. That would be a real fault-tolerant solution, am I right?
RE
Reita
2 years ago
I think the real fault here is the person who came up with this question. It's like they're trying to trick us or something. Personally, I'm going with C, but I'm not too confident about it.
SH
Sheridan
2 years ago
I believe load balancing all PVWAs under the same URL would be the best option for fault tolerance.
LE
Leatha
2 years ago
This question is a piece of cake! The setup is already fault-tolerant, so A is the way to go. Why overcomplicate things?
KA
Karon
2 years ago
C) Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.
AM
Amira
2 years ago
B) Install more PVWAs in each data center.
FI
Filiberto
2 years ago
D) Load balance all PVWAs under same URL.
AL
Alana
2 years ago
C) Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.
ME
Meghann
2 years ago
B) Install more PVWAs in each data center.
NY
Nydia
2 years ago
A) This setup is already fault tolerant.
JE
Jeanice
2 years ago
A) This setup is already fault tolerant.
DO
Dominque
2 years ago
I think we should also continuously monitor PVWA status and redirect users to another PVWA if needed.
SH
Sherell
2 years ago
I agree with Valda, having more PVWAs would make the setup more fault tolerant.
VA
Valda
2 years ago
I think we should install more PVWAs in each data center.
RE
Rebecka
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if we just install more PVWAs in each data center? That way, we have redundancy and can handle more users. I'm going with B.
TE
Tenesha
2 years ago
I disagree, I think the correct answer is C. Continuously monitoring the PVWA status and sending users the link to another PVWA when issues are encountered is the way to go. That way, you can ensure that users always have access to a working PVWA.
RI
Rima
2 years ago
D) Load balance all PVWAs under same URL.
AM
Amber
2 years ago
C) Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.
NO
Nobuko
2 years ago
B) Install more PVWAs in each data center.
GE
Gerald
2 years ago
A) This setup is already fault tolerant.
FR
Franchesca
2 years ago
Well, I think the answer is obviously D. Load balancing all the PVWAs under the same URL is the way to go. That way, if one PVWA goes down, the users can seamlessly switch to another one without any disruption.
LE
Leonardo
2 years ago
A. This setup is already fault tolerant.
CE
Cecilia
2 years ago
D. Load balance all PVWAs under same URL.
AL
Alex
2 years ago
B: Agreed. Having all PVWAs under the same URL simplifies the process for users in case of any issues.
MA
Margurite
2 years ago
A: I think D is the best option too. It ensures high availability for the users.