Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk PAM-SEN Exam - Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 1
[All PAM-SEN Questions]

If a customer has one data center and requires fault tolerance, how many PVWAs should be deployed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Francine at Oct 05, 2023, 11:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tyisha
5 months ago
One PVWA? That doesn't sound right for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
5 months ago
Agreed, two is the way to go for reliability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure about needing two? Seems excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
5 months ago
I think one PVWA cluster should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
6 months ago
Definitely two or more PVWAs for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought one could be enough if it’s a strong enough setup, but I guess that might not be fault tolerant? Maybe C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
6 months ago
I feel like we went over this, and it was emphasized that having two or more is safer, so I'm leaning towards A as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question where one cluster was mentioned for redundancy. Could it be B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
6 months ago
I think we discussed that for fault tolerance, you usually need at least two instances, so maybe it's A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Fault tolerance usually means redundancy, so I'm guessing the customer would need at least two PVWAs to ensure their system can still function if one goes down. I'll go with A for two or more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions a single data center, but it also says the customer requires fault tolerance. Does that mean they need two PVWA clusters? I'm a bit confused on the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
6 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward - if the customer needs fault tolerance, they'll need at least two PVWAs, so I'm thinking A is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
7 months ago
I think the key here is the requirement for fault tolerance. That implies they need redundancy, so a single PVWA wouldn't be enough. I'm leaning towards A or D, but I'll need to double-check the details to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
7 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. I'm pretty sure the answer is Ordered control mode, since that's the one that only propagates labels for the next-hop FEC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we can use the Type Into activity, but I'm not sure if that's the best way to navigate to a page. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the key concepts around wills and estate planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. I'll need to insert the SUMIF formula in cell M10 on the "Summer Bookings" worksheet, using the criteria of ">=12" in the "Group Size" column and summing the "Total" column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
11 months ago
Two PVWA clusters? What is this, a PVWA party? I'll stick with the one PVWA cluster, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Gladis
10 months ago
Yeah, no need for a PVWA party with two clusters. One is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
10 months ago
Having two PVWA clusters does seem like overkill. One should suffice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
10 months ago
Yeah, one PVWA cluster should be sufficient for a single data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
I agree, having two PVWA clusters seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
10 months ago
One PVWA cluster should be enough for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
11 months ago
I agree, one PVWA cluster should be enough for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
12 months ago
This is a piece of cake. One PVWA is all they need. Gotta keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Rosio
11 months ago
Exactly, keeping it simple is key in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
11 months ago
So, the answer is C) one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
11 months ago
One PVWA is all they need. Gotta keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lore
12 months ago
Clearly, the answer is two PVWAs. Anything less and the customer is just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd need more information about the customer's specific requirements before choosing an answer.
upvoted 0 times
Lavina
11 months ago
User 4: It's important to consider the customer's requirements before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
11 months ago
User 3: I agree, having two or more PVWAs could provide better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
12 months ago
User 2: Maybe they would need more than one PVWA for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
12 months ago
User 1: I think the answer might depend on the customer's specific needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
12 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. A PVWA cluster provides the fault tolerance the customer needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is D) two PVWA clusters for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
1 year ago
I agree with Isadora, having multiple PVWAs would provide better fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) two or more PVWAs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel