MENU
Which of the following are secure options for storing the contents of the Operator CD, while still allowing the contents to be accessible upon a planned Vault restart? (Choose three.)
Suggested Answer: A, C, D
Get Premium PAM-CDE-RECERT Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
23 comments · newest first
AU
Audra
10 months ago
Definitely prefer using an HSM for key storage!
ZI
Zita
10 months ago
NTFS permissions are a solid choice for security.
TW
Twila
10 months ago
Storing in a physical safe is super secure!
SH
Sherita
10 months ago
I think copying to the system Safe is risky.
CH
Cherilyn
11 months ago
Wait, can you really trust NTFS for sensitive data?
CA
Cassie
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think option B was mentioned as a potential risk, but I can't remember the details.
TR
Trinidad
11 months ago
I vaguely recall something about HSMs being really secure, so option D might be a good idea, but I'm not entirely clear on how it integrates with the Vault.
CO
Cordie
11 months ago
I think option C could work since NTFS permissions can provide good security, but I wonder if copying everything to the server is the best approach.
SH
Sharan
11 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of physical security, so option A seems like a secure choice, but I'm not sure if it's practical for regular access.
GU
Gussie
12 months ago
I've got this! Copying the contents to the system safe and the secured folder on the server are the way to go. That covers both the physical and digital security aspects.
VI
Vicki
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. Copying the contents to a secured folder seems like the most straightforward solution, but I want to make sure I'm not missing any important security considerations.
VI
Vincenza
12 months ago
Storing the server key in an HSM and securing the other keys with NTFS permissions sounds like a good approach to me. That way the critical components are protected while still allowing access when needed.
EZ
Ezekiel
1 year ago
Hmm, storing the CD in a physical safe and mounting it every time seems like a hassle. I'm leaning more towards copying the contents to the system safe or a secured folder on the server.
SH
Shonda
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the security implications of each.
FA
Fausto
1 year ago
I think option D is also secure because storing the server key in a Hardware Security Module adds an extra layer of protection.
YO
Yong
1 year ago
I agree with Louvenia, option C seems like a good choice to keep the contents secure.
NO
Noemi
1 year ago
I wonder if the Vault has a built-in CD player. You know, for that authentic 90s tech vibe.
GA
Gayla
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about A. Having to mount the CD every time for maintenance seems a bit tedious. I'd stick with C and D.
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
I think option C is secure because NTFS permissions can control access.
WI
William
1 year ago
I'd go with B and D. Copying the CD to the system safe and storing the server key in an HSM provides the best balance of security and accessibility.
GE
German
1 year ago
B) Copy the entire contents of the CD to the system Safe on the Vault
JA
Jani
1 year ago
Putting the CD in a physical safe? What is this, the 1980s?
CR
Cristina
1 year ago
A) Store the CD in a physical safe and mount the CD every time Vault maintenance is performed