Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk ACCESS-DEF Exam - Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Which statement is correct about the CyberArk Identity Windows Device Trust enrollment process?
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
A) An enrollment code is optional.
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
D) You can define the minimum number of joinable endpoints.

CyberArk ACCESS-DEF Exam - Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's ACCESS-DEF exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All ACCESS-DEF Questions]

Which statement is correct about the CyberArk Identity Windows Device Trust enrollment process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Royal
7 months ago
D sounds off. Why would you set a minimum?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
8 months ago
C is interesting, but I’m not sure about the max endpoints part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
8 months ago
Wait, really? I thought domain-joined was a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
8 months ago
I agree, B makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
8 months ago
I think option B is correct. No domain join needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the minimum and maximum endpoints; I feel like both options could be possible, but I’m leaning towards D being incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
9 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think defining the maximum number of joinable endpoints sounds familiar, so maybe C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
9 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like the endpoint does need to be domain-joined for the process to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
9 months ago
I think I remember that the enrollment code is actually required, so A might be incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about this question. I don't recall learning about defining the maximum or minimum number of joinable endpoints. I'll have to review my notes and see if I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
9 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know the enrollment code is optional, so that rules out A. And the endpoint doesn't need to be domain-joined, so that's B. I'm a bit unsure about the other options, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
9 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the maximum or minimum number of joinable endpoints is something we can define. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The enrollment code is optional, and the endpoint doesn't need to be domain-joined, so I'll go with B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
1 year ago
Wait, there's no option for 'none of the above'? This exam is rigged!
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
1 year ago
D) You can define the minimum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
1 year ago
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
1 year ago
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 year ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
1 year ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
1 year ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go. Defining the minimum number of joinable endpoints is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
1 year ago
Defining the minimum number of joinable endpoints gives us more control over the enrollment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
1 year ago
I think it's important to have control over the number of endpoints that can be joined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
1 year ago
I agree, setting a minimum number of joinable endpoints is important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viki
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is 'all of the above'. CyberArk is always making things complicated!
upvoted 0 times
Mabel
1 year ago
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
1 year ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
1 year ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kip
1 year ago
I'm going with option B. The endpoint not needing to be domain-joined is a big plus for me.
upvoted 0 times
Lashunda
1 year ago
I agree, not having to worry about domain-joined machines simplifies things a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 year ago
Option B is definitely a game changer. Makes the enrollment process much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tequila
1 year ago
I think both A and B could be correct, but I would go with B because it makes more sense in terms of flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct statement is B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. Being able to define the maximum number of joinable endpoints seems like a useful feature.
upvoted 0 times
Lynda
1 year ago
Having the option to set a maximum number of joinable endpoints gives more control over device trust enrollment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
1 year ago
It definitely adds a layer of security to be able to define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
1 year ago
I think it's great that you can set a limit on how many endpoints can be enrolled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 year ago
I agree, having control over the maximum number of joinable endpoints is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristin
1 year ago
I think the correct statement is A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel