Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk ACCESS-DEF Exam - Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's ACCESS-DEF exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All ACCESS-DEF Questions]

Which statement is correct about the CyberArk Identity Windows Device Trust enrollment process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lenna at Jan 14, 2025, 05:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACCESS-DEF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Royal
4 months ago
D sounds off. Why would you set a minimum?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
5 months ago
C is interesting, but I’m not sure about the max endpoints part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
5 months ago
Wait, really? I thought domain-joined was a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
5 months ago
I agree, B makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
5 months ago
I think option B is correct. No domain join needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the minimum and maximum endpoints; I feel like both options could be possible, but I’m leaning towards D being incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think defining the maximum number of joinable endpoints sounds familiar, so maybe C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
6 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like the endpoint does need to be domain-joined for the process to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
6 months ago
I think I remember that the enrollment code is actually required, so A might be incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about this question. I don't recall learning about defining the maximum or minimum number of joinable endpoints. I'll have to review my notes and see if I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know the enrollment code is optional, so that rules out A. And the endpoint doesn't need to be domain-joined, so that's B. I'm a bit unsure about the other options, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the maximum or minimum number of joinable endpoints is something we can define. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The enrollment code is optional, and the endpoint doesn't need to be domain-joined, so I'll go with B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
11 months ago
Wait, there's no option for 'none of the above'? This exam is rigged!
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
9 months ago
D) You can define the minimum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
10 months ago
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
10 months ago
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
10 months ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
10 months ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
10 months ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
10 months ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
11 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Defining the minimum number of joinable endpoints is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
10 months ago
Defining the minimum number of joinable endpoints gives us more control over the enrollment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
10 months ago
I think it's important to have control over the number of endpoints that can be joined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
10 months ago
I agree, setting a minimum number of joinable endpoints is important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viki
12 months ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is 'all of the above'. CyberArk is always making things complicated!
upvoted 0 times
Mabel
10 months ago
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
10 months ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
10 months ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kip
12 months ago
I'm going with option B. The endpoint not needing to be domain-joined is a big plus for me.
upvoted 0 times
Lashunda
11 months ago
I agree, not having to worry about domain-joined machines simplifies things a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
11 months ago
Option B is definitely a game changer. Makes the enrollment process much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tequila
12 months ago
I think both A and B could be correct, but I would go with B because it makes more sense in terms of flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct statement is B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. Being able to define the maximum number of joinable endpoints seems like a useful feature.
upvoted 0 times
Lynda
11 months ago
Having the option to set a maximum number of joinable endpoints gives more control over device trust enrollment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
11 months ago
It definitely adds a layer of security to be able to define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
11 months ago
I think it's great that you can set a limit on how many endpoints can be enrolled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
11 months ago
I agree, having control over the maximum number of joinable endpoints is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristin
1 year ago
I think the correct statement is A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel