Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP CWSP-208 Exam - Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-208 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All CWSP-208 Questions]

You are configuring seven APs to prevent common security attacks. The APs are to be installed in a small business and to reduce costs, the company decided to install all consumer-grade wireless routers. The wireless routers will connect to a switch, which connects directly to the Internet connection providing 50 Mbps of Internet bandwidth that will be shared among 53 wireless clients and 17 wired clients.

To ensure the wireless network is as secure as possible from common attacks, what security measure can you implement given only the hardware referenced?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Blythe
1 day ago
Definitely go with WPA2-Personal for simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
6 days ago
Wait, can consumer-grade routers even support WPA2-Enterprise?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
11 days ago
I disagree, WPA2-Enterprise would be more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
17 days ago
WPA2-Personal is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
22 days ago
I hope they have a good IT team to manage all those APs and clients!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
27 days ago
Wow, 53 wireless clients and 17 wired clients? That's a lot of devices to secure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
2 months ago
A) WPA-Enterprise is outdated and not recommended for modern networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
2 months ago
D) WPA2-Personal is a good choice for a small business with limited resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
2 months ago
C) WPA2-Enterprise is the best option to secure the wireless network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between WPA2-Personal and WPA2-Enterprise. I guess I need to think about the hardware limitations here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
2 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think WPA2-Personal was mentioned as a common choice for securing small networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
2 months ago
I think WPA-Enterprise would be ideal for larger networks, but since these are consumer-grade routers, I'm not sure if they support it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
3 months ago
I remember we discussed WPA2-Personal in class as a good option for small businesses, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question mentions reducing costs, so I'm not sure if the more advanced security options like 802.1X would be feasible. I might go with WPA2-Personal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
3 months ago
WPA2-Personal seems like the most practical solution given the constraints. It's a common security standard that should work well with the consumer-grade routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards WPA2-Enterprise. Even though the hardware is consumer-grade, WPA2-Enterprise can still provide a higher level of security than WPA2-Personal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
3 months ago
Hmm, I think WPA2-Personal might be the best choice here. It's a good balance of security and ease of use for a small business with consumer hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
3 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions consumer-grade wireless routers, so I'm not sure if enterprise-level security like WPA-Enterprise or 802.1X would be an option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel