New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP CWISA-102 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-102 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All CWISA-102 Questions]

What user authentication method is commonly used in guest Wi-Fi networks in the hospitality industry?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Captive Portals for Guest Access:These are web pages that intercept users' requests before granting full internet access. They often require agreeing to terms, entering basic information, or viewing ads.

Hospitality Fit:Captive portals are simple to deploy, require minimal user setup, and provide control for the hospitality provider (e.g., usage limits).

Why Other Options Are Less Common:

NTLM:Microsoft authentication, mainly for corporate networks, too complex for casual guest use.

Kerberos:Complex authentication for enterprise, overkill for guest Wi-Fi

SIM Cards:Used in cellular devices, not for general Wi-Fi access.

References:

Captive Portals:References of how they work and their use cases.

Guest Wi-Fi in Hospitality:Best practices highlight the prevalence of captive portals in this industry.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Letha
3 months ago
Yup, captive portals are the go-to for guest Wi-Fi access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
3 months ago
Really? I didn't know captive portals were that popular.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
3 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it was NTLM for some places.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
4 months ago
Agreed! Captive portals are everywhere in hospitality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
4 months ago
Definitely a captive portal! It's super common in hotels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
4 months ago
I thought Kerberos was more for enterprise environments? I’m a bit confused, but captive portal seems to fit the hospitality context better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I recall practicing a question about guest networks, and captive portals were definitely mentioned. So I’m leaning towards B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like NTLM could be a possibility too. I might be mixing it up with other authentication methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
I think the answer might be B, captive portal. I remember studying that in relation to public Wi-Fi access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
5 months ago
Captive portal is definitely the answer here. That's the standard way hotels and airports provide guest Wi-Fi access by requiring users to authenticate through a web page. I'm sure about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
5 months ago
I'm a little confused on this question. I know there are different authentication methods used for Wi-Fi, but I'm not sure which one is most common in the hospitality industry specifically. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I know captive portals are used for guest Wi-Fi, but I can't remember if that's the only method or if there are other options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is Captive portal, that's the most common authentication method I've seen used in hotel and airport Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
Captive portal sounds right to me. That's the login page you have to go through to access the guest Wi-Fi, where you typically enter your room number or other info. I feel confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is the delivery stage of the Cyber Kill Chain, since the user received the suspicious email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
5 months ago
I feel that balancing risk appetite with objectives covers a lot of ground, but I still have a nagging doubt about the regulatory requirements part in option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, it seems like option C, using the pkg set-publisher command, is the way to go. That should allow me to point the existing publisher to the new local repository location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know Windows Update handles a lot of system updates, but I'm not positive if it specifically handles driver updates. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 years ago
Captive portal, hands down. It's like the hotel version of 'welcome to the jungle, we've got cookies.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
2 years ago
NTLM? What is this, the Dark Ages? Captive portal is the way to go, my dudes.
upvoted 0 times
Maryrose
2 years ago
Yeah, NTLM is outdated. Captive portal is much more user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
2 years ago
Captive portal is definitely the way to go for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cletus
2 years ago
Kerberos? Isn't that like, a three-headed dog or something? I'm going with the portal.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
2 years ago
Definitely not NTLM or SIM cards for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Captive portal is commonly used in the hospitality industry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the authentication method used in guest Wi-Fi networks is a Captive portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 years ago
I think Kerberos is a three-headed dog from Greek mythology.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrin
2 years ago
I believe Captive portal is the most commonly used method for guest Wi-Fi networks in the hospitality industry because it allows users to authenticate through a web page before accessing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think NTLM could also be a possible option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
2 years ago
I agree with Lemuel, Captive portal makes sense for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Captive portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 years ago
Gotta be SIM cards, right? I mean, how else are they gonna track us, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
2 years ago
Yeah, Captive portal makes more sense for guest Wi-Fi networks in hotels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
2 years ago
A) NTLM
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
2 years ago
I think it's actually Captive portal, they usually make you agree to terms and conditions before accessing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
2 years ago
B) Captive portal
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desire
2 years ago
Captive portal, definitely! That's what I've seen in all the hotels I've stayed at.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
2 years ago
I agree, it's a simple and effective method for user authentication in guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
2 years ago
It's a convenient way for guests to access the network and for the hotel to control access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 years ago
Yes, captive portal is commonly used in the hospitality industry for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel