Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWDP-305 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

NicoCo is building a new facility and would like to install a WLAN for primary connectivity of all clients. The requirements are dual-spectrum 802.11n supporting voice and location tracking.What type of pre-deployment survey should be performed?Response:
D) Predictive
A) Passive, using optimized channels
B) Active, using a voice handset
C) Active, using a lowest common denominator client
E) Passive, all channels

CWNP CWDP-305 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWDP-305 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All CWDP-305 Questions]

NicoCo is building a new facility and would like to install a WLAN for primary connectivity of all clients. The requirements are dual-spectrum 802.11n supporting voice and location tracking.

What type of pre-deployment survey should be performed?

Response:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Delsie at Nov 22, 2025, 09:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWDP-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gene
3 months ago
I feel B) is the most reliable. Real-time testing shows actual performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
3 months ago
E) Passive, all channels is too broad. We need focused data for voice and tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
3 months ago
D) Predictive could work, but it’s not as accurate as active methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
3 months ago
C) Active, using a lowest common denominator client makes sense. It ensures compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
4 months ago
I think B) Active, using a voice handset is best. It tests voice quality directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
4 months ago
I’m surprised there’s no mention of 802.11ac for better performance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
4 months ago
Passive surveys can miss a lot of real-world issues, so I’m not sold on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
Wait, why not just do a predictive survey? Seems easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
Haha, "lowest common denominator client" - that's IT support in a nutshell right there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
5 months ago
B) Active, using a voice handset? Seriously? Who even uses voice on a WLAN these days?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
5 months ago
E) Passive, all channels? Nah, that's just lazy. You gotta put in the work for a proper survey.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
5 months ago
D) Predictive survey sounds like the most comprehensive approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
5 months ago
C) Active, using a lowest common denominator client is the way to go. Gotta test with the weakest link!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, using a voice handset for the active survey. It seems like the most direct way to test voice quality, but I’m not confident about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
6 months ago
I feel like a passive survey could work, especially if we optimize the channels first. But would that really cover the voice and location tracking requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
6 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think predictive surveys are often used for planning, but they might not give us the real-world data we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
6 months ago
I think we might need an active survey since voice support is crucial for the WLAN. But I'm not entirely sure if using a voice handset is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
6 months ago
Predictive survey could work, but I'm not sure if that fully addresses the voice and location tracking requirements. I might need to dig deeper into the differences between the survey types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C - an active survey using a lowest common denominator client. That seems like it would best simulate the actual client devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
7 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think the key here is that they need to support voice, so an active survey using a voice handset might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
7 months ago
Definitely agree, option B makes the most sense for voice support!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
7 months ago
I think an active survey with a voice handset is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
7 months ago
I prefer A) Passive, using optimized channels. It’s less intrusive and gives a good overview.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like it could be a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the details about dual-spectrum, voice, and location tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
8 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think through the different survey types and how they apply to the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
2 months ago
E is a safe bet. Passive on all channels gives a broad view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
C might be useful. Testing with a basic client could show compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
3 months ago
D sounds interesting. Predictive could save time before deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
I think A is solid too. Passive with optimized channels could work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Active with a voice handset seems best for voice support.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel