Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP CWDP-305 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Posted by Delsie on Nov 22, 2025 at 09:02 PM

NicoCo is building a new facility and would like to install a WLAN for primary connectivity of all clients. The requirements are dual-spectrum 802.11n supporting voice and location tracking.

What type of pre-deployment survey should be performed?

Response:

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium CWDP-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
GE
Gene 6 months ago
I feel B) is the most reliable. Real-time testing shows actual performance.
AL
Aleta 6 months ago
E) Passive, all channels is too broad. We need focused data for voice and tracking.
MA
Maxima 6 months ago
D) Predictive could work, but it’s not as accurate as active methods.
GL
Glendora 6 months ago
C) Active, using a lowest common denominator client makes sense. It ensures compatibility.
CE
Cecily 7 months ago
I think B) Active, using a voice handset is best. It tests voice quality directly.
VE
Venita 7 months ago
I’m surprised there’s no mention of 802.11ac for better performance!
EN
Ena 7 months ago
Passive surveys can miss a lot of real-world issues, so I’m not sold on that.
PA
Paris 8 months ago
Wait, why not just do a predictive survey? Seems easier.
RA
Raul 8 months ago
Haha, "lowest common denominator client" - that's IT support in a nutshell right there.
LE
Letha 8 months ago
B) Active, using a voice handset? Seriously? Who even uses voice on a WLAN these days?
AU
Audry 8 months ago
E) Passive, all channels? Nah, that's just lazy. You gotta put in the work for a proper survey.
FI
Fidelia 8 months ago
D) Predictive survey sounds like the most comprehensive approach to me.
PE
Pete 8 months ago
C) Active, using a lowest common denominator client is the way to go. Gotta test with the weakest link!
SH
Sharen 9 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, using a voice handset for the active survey. It seems like the most direct way to test voice quality, but I’m not confident about the specifics.
SU
Sue 9 months ago
I feel like a passive survey could work, especially if we optimize the channels first. But would that really cover the voice and location tracking requirements?
MA
Margo 9 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think predictive surveys are often used for planning, but they might not give us the real-world data we need.
JA
Jaime 9 months ago
I think we might need an active survey since voice support is crucial for the WLAN. But I'm not entirely sure if using a voice handset is the best approach.
TH
Theresia 9 months ago
Predictive survey could work, but I'm not sure if that fully addresses the voice and location tracking requirements. I might need to dig deeper into the differences between the survey types.
LO
Loren 10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C - an active survey using a lowest common denominator client. That seems like it would best simulate the actual client devices.
TE
Tequila 10 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think the key here is that they need to support voice, so an active survey using a voice handset might be the way to go.
VE
Verda 10 months ago
Definitely agree, option B makes the most sense for voice support!
ST
Stevie 10 months ago
I think an active survey with a voice handset is the way to go.
LU
Lucy 11 months ago
I prefer A) Passive, using optimized channels. It’s less intrusive and gives a good overview.
SA
Sabrina 11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like it could be a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the details about dual-spectrum, voice, and location tracking.
SH
Sharan 11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think through the different survey types and how they apply to the requirements.
RO
Rosendo 5 months ago
↳ replying to Sharan
E is a safe bet. Passive on all channels gives a broad view.
KA
Karan 5 months ago
↳ replying to Sharan
C might be useful. Testing with a basic client could show compatibility.
JE
Jesusa 6 months ago
↳ replying to Sharan
D sounds interesting. Predictive could save time before deployment.
GL
Glory 6 months ago
↳ replying to Sharan
I think A is solid too. Passive with optimized channels could work well.
AB
Abraham 10 months ago
↳ replying to Sharan
I'm leaning towards option B. Active with a voice handset seems best for voice support.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel