You're about to deploy an Enterprise-class VoWLAN infrastructure. You need to ensure that QoS is properly configured throughout the network.
What Access
Category (AC) should voice frames/packets use?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CWDP-305 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
GL
Glenna
10 months ago
AC_BE is not suitable for voice, just saying!
CE
Celia
10 months ago
AC_VI could work too, but AC_VO is preferred.
JE
Jeannetta
10 months ago
I agree, AC_VO is the way to go.
RO
Rory
10 months ago
Definitely AC_VO for voice packets!
AL
Aliza
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure AC_VO is the best choice?
BA
Barney
11 months ago
I feel like AC_VO is definitely the right choice for voice, but I hope I’m not mixing it up with something else I studied!
ME
Melynda
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought AC_BE was for best effort traffic. Does that mean it’s not suitable for voice?
LA
Laquita
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I believe AC_VI was mentioned for video traffic, not voice.
FA
Fausto
11 months ago
I think voice packets should use AC_VO for better QoS, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only option.
DA
Dana
12 months ago
I'm confident AC_VO is the way to go. Voice frames need the most priority to avoid any delays or quality issues.
RI
Rikki
12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know voice traffic needs to be prioritized, so I'm guessing AC_VO is the right answer here.
IV
Ivette
12 months ago
For VoWLAN, you'll want to use AC_VO to ensure the highest priority and lowest latency for voice packets. This is the best way to maintain QoS.
ME
Melodie
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is AC_VI the correct choice for voice traffic, or is there a more specific category I should be using?
JA
Jaime
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. Voice frames should use the highest priority access category, which is AC_VO.
HI
Hildegarde
1 year ago
AC_VO all the way, baby! I'm not about to let the CEO's important conference call sound like a robot choir.
NE
Nenita
1 year ago
I'm feeling lucky, let's go with C) AC_BE. Who needs fancy QoS when you've got pure skill?
KI
Kiley
1 year ago
I believe AC_VO is the best choice because it provides the highest priority for voice traffic.
TU
Tuyet
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think AC_BE might also be a good option for voice frames.
PA
Patrick
1 year ago
B) AC_VO, no doubt about it. Anything less and the bosses won't be happy with the call quality.
TY
Tyisha
1 year ago
C) AC_BE is not suitable for voice frames, it's better to stick with AC_VO for QoS in a VoWLAN infrastructure.
TE
Teddy
1 year ago
C) AC_BE is not recommended for voice frames/packets as it does not prioritize them properly. Stick with AC_VO for the best results.
AL
Aliza
1 year ago
A) AC_VI is also a good option for voice frames, but AC_VO is the best choice for ensuring top-notch call quality.
CH
Christa
1 year ago
A) AC_VI is also a good option for voice frames, but AC_VO is the best choice for ensuring top-notch call quality.
TE
Tenesha
1 year ago
I agree with Eladia, AC_VO is the right choice for QoS.
EL
Eladia
1 year ago
I think voice frames should use AC_VO.
LA
Layla
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure, but I think B) AC_VO sounds like the way to go. Wouldn't want any dropped calls!
IV
Ivory
1 year ago
I'm going with B) AC_VO. Gotta keep those voice packets moving!
JE
Jesusa
1 year ago
Definitely, AC_VO will prioritize voice traffic effectively.
BO
Bok
1 year ago
I agree, AC_VO is the best choice for QoS.
MO
Mozelle
1 year ago
AC_VO is the way to go for voice packets.
JO
Joaquin
1 year ago
Definitely AC_VO, that's the priority class for voice traffic, right?
ST
Stephanie
1 year ago
Make sure to configure QoS properly throughout the network to prioritize voice traffic with AC_VO.
OD
Odette
1 year ago
AC_VO is indeed the priority class for voice traffic in a VoWLAN infrastructure.
LO
Loren
1 year ago
Yes, you're correct. AC_VO is the Access Category that voice frames/packets should use.