Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CSA CCSK Exam - Topic 1 Question 76 Discussion

Posted by Glenn on Sep 18, 2024 at 12:09 AM

If the management plane has been breached, you should confirm the templates/configurations for your infrastructure or applications have not also been compromised.

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CCSK Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
DE
Desmond 10 months ago
Surprised this isn't common knowledge!
LE
Leonida 11 months ago
False, I don’t think that’s necessary.
DE
Devorah 11 months ago
Agreed, better safe than sorry!
RH
Rhea 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure the breach affects configs too?
RO
Roy 11 months ago
Definitely true, always check your configs!
AD
Adelle 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused here. I thought the management plane was separate from the application layer, but I guess it makes sense to check everything.
EL
Eloisa 12 months ago
I definitely recall studying that a breach in the management plane usually means we should verify everything else. So, I’m leaning towards true.
AR
Arlean 12 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like it could be false. Maybe the breach doesn’t affect templates directly?
AJ
Aja 1 year ago
I think it’s true that if the management plane is breached, we need to check configurations. I remember a practice question about this.
MI
Mickie 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. What exactly is the "management plane"? Is that the same as the control plane? I need to make sure I'm clear on the terminology before I can answer confidently.
LE
Levi 1 year ago
Okay, let me see if I've got this right. The management plane is separate from the infrastructure/apps, so even if the management plane is breached, the configs might still be okay. I'm leaning towards A, but I'll double-check my understanding.
TY
Ty 1 year ago
Easy peasy! The question is clear - if the management plane is breached, you need to confirm the templates/configs haven't been touched. B is the obvious choice here.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Is the management plane separate from the infrastructure/applications, or are they all connected? I want to make sure I understand the relationship before answering.
GE
Georgeanna 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'd go with B - True, since if the management plane has been breached, the configurations could also be compromised.
CA
Cassandra 1 year ago
This is a great question that requires some deeper analysis. I'll need to carefully consider the Zero Trust model and how the proposed solution fits with that approach. I'll make sure to provide a well-reasoned recommendation.
JA
Jannette 2 years ago
B baby, B! When the management plane is on fire, you better believe I'm checking every nook and cranny for tampering. I'm not taking any chances with my precious infrastructure!
RE
Renay 2 years ago
Option B, no doubt. I'd rather waste a few minutes verifying than have my entire setup compromised. That's just common sense, folks.
JO
Joesph 2 years ago
↳ replying to Renay
Definitely true, always better to double check. True.
GE
Gerry 2 years ago
↳ replying to Renay
Absolutely, can't take any chances. True.
KA
Kattie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Renay
I agree, better safe than sorry. True.
AL
Alline 2 years ago
Haha, what a no-brainer! Of course the templates and configs need to be verified. I bet the person who came up with answer A is the same one who leaves their door unlocked at night.
AN
Anissa 2 years ago
B all the way. Gotta double-check everything when the bad guys are in the house. Wouldn't want them messing with my sweet infrastructure.
QU
Quentin 2 years ago
Definitely true. Better safe than sorry when the management plane is breached. Can't be too careful with those configs!
NE
Nelida 2 years ago
↳ replying to Quentin
Definitely true. Better safe than sorry when the management plane is breached. Can't be too careful with those configs!
WI
Willodean 2 years ago
↳ replying to Quentin
B) True
YU
Yuette 2 years ago
↳ replying to Quentin
A) False
MA
Marilynn 2 years ago
I disagree, Jeanice. It's better to be safe than sorry and ensure everything is secure.
JE
Jeanice 2 years ago
False. I don't think it's necessary to confirm the templates/configurations.
VA
Vallie 2 years ago
Oh man, this is like that one time I tried to bake a cake and the oven caught fire. Gotta check those configs, folks!
SH
Sheridan 2 years ago
Hmm, I'd say True. Kinda like locking the stable door after the horse has bolted, but hey, better late than never!
AM
Amie 2 years ago
I agree, verifying the integrity of our configs is the right call. Gotta keep those systems squeaky clean.
SA
Santos 2 years ago
↳ replying to Amie
I agree, verifying the integrity of our configs is the right call. Gotta keep those systems squeaky clean.
BR
Bronwyn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Amie
B) True
CO
Coral 2 years ago
↳ replying to Amie
A) False
CH
Chantay 2 years ago
Yes, this is a crucial step. Can't let the bad guys get their hands on our infrastructure goodies.
MA
Marilynn 2 years ago
True. It's important to check for any potential compromise.
RO
Robt 2 years ago
Absolutely, we need to check the templates and configs to ensure they haven't been tampered with. Better safe than sorry!
LE
Lenna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Robt
Absolutely, we need to check the templates and configs to ensure they haven't been tampered with. Better safe than sorry!
TW
Twana 2 years ago
↳ replying to Robt
B) True
CA
Casey 2 years ago
↳ replying to Robt
A) False
EV
Evelynn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Robt
B) True
LE
Leslie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Robt
A) False
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel