Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Confluent CCDAK Exam - Topic 3 Question 67 Discussion

Posted by Amber on Sep 19, 2024 at 06:27 AM

The rule "same key goes to the same partition" is true unless...

Suggested Answer: A

metadata is stored in and built from the KSQL command topic. Each KSQL server has its own in-memory version of the metastore.


Get Premium CCDAK Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
WI
Winfred 10 months ago
Replication factor changes don't affect partitioning, just saying!
AN
Annabelle 11 months ago
I didn't know that! So, partition changes can really affect it?
TE
Teri 11 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it was about broker changes.
GO
Golda 11 months ago
Totally agree, partition changes are the key factor here.
FR
Frederic 11 months ago
It's C - partition changes mess with the key mapping!
BE
Beatriz 12 months ago
I remember discussing how producer changes shouldn't affect the partitioning, so maybe it's not A? This is tricky!
NO
Nobuko 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards D because replication factors seem like they could impact how data is partitioned, but I’m not confident.
KI
Kirk 12 months ago
I feel like I saw a practice question similar to this, and it mentioned broker changes. But I can't recall if that was the right context.
LA
Larae 1 year ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about partitions changing affecting key distribution.
LA
Lashawna 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I know the general partitioning rule, but I'm not sure what the specific exceptions are. I'll have to read through the options carefully and try to reason through which one would cause the rule to not apply.
JA
Janey 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key always goes to the same partition unless something changes the partitioning, like the number of producers, brokers, or partitions. I'll double-check the options to make sure I have the right exception.
LI
Lindsey 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the partitioning rule, but I'm not sure what the exceptions would be. I'll have to carefully consider each of the options.
ST
Stephaine 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Kafka partitioning. I'll need to think through the different scenarios where the "same key goes to the same partition" rule might not apply.
NI
Nikita 1 year ago
I think the key point is that the loss was recorded in May, so it shouldn't affect the quarterly income statement for June, right?
YU
Yuki 1 year ago
Wait, does the answer involve a quantum entanglement between the producers and the Kafka gods? That would be a plot twist!
ST
Stephanie 1 year ago
Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser. I'm gonna have to go with A just to be different!
NO
Norah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephanie
I'm sticking with A, the number of producer changes.
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephanie
I believe it's C, the number of partition changes.
JA
Jani 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephanie
I think the answer is D, the replication factor changes.
KA
Kaycee 1 year ago
Ooh, tricky one! I'm going to go with D. The replication factor changing could mess up the partitioning, right?
AL
Alba 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kaycee
User 3: Agreed, D seems like the most logical choice in this scenario.
JO
Josphine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kaycee
User 2: Yeah, changing the replication factor could definitely affect the partitioning.
DA
Danica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kaycee
User 1: I think D is the correct answer.
RE
Rex 1 year ago
Hmm, I was thinking B might be the right answer. After all, if the number of brokers changes, the partitioning would need to be recalculated.
SH
Shaun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rex
D) the replication factor changes
AR
Aretha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rex
C) the number of partition changes
MA
Maynard 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rex
B) the number of kafka broker changes
VI
Viva 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rex
A) the number of producer changes
TO
Tora 2 years ago
But what if the number of kafka brokers changes? Wouldn't that also impact the partitioning?
VI
Viva 2 years ago
I'd say the answer is C. Changing the number of partitions would definitely affect the partitioning rule.
EM
Emilio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
D) the replication factor changes
PH
Phuong 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
C) the number of partition changes
AN
Annelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
B) the number of kafka broker changes
JE
Jettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Viva
A) the number of producer changes
SA
Sang 2 years ago
I agree with Annice, changing the replication factor would affect the partitioning.
AN
Annice 2 years ago
I think the answer is D) the replication factor changes.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel