Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Confluent CCDAK Exam - Topic 3 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Confluent's CCDAK exam

Question #: 67
Topic #: 3

[All CCDAK Questions]

The rule "same key goes to the same partition" is true unless...

Athe number of producer changes

Bthe number of kafka broker changes

Cthe number of partition changes

Dthe replication factor changes

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

metadata is stored in and built from the KSQL command topic. Each KSQL server has its own in-memory version of the metastore.

by Amber at Sep 19, 2024, 06:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCDAK Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Winfred

7 months ago

Replication factor changes don't affect partitioning, just saying!

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

8 months ago

I didn't know that! So, partition changes can really affect it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

8 months ago

Wait, are you sure? I thought it was about broker changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

8 months ago

Totally agree, partition changes are the key factor here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederic

8 months ago

It's C - partition changes mess with the key mapping!

upvoted 0 times

...

Beatriz

9 months ago

I remember discussing how producer changes shouldn't affect the partitioning, so maybe it's not A? This is tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

9 months ago

I’m leaning towards D because replication factors seem like they could impact how data is partitioned, but I’m not confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirk

9 months ago

I feel like I saw a practice question similar to this, and it mentioned broker changes. But I can't recall if that was the right context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

9 months ago

I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about partitions changing affecting key distribution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawna

9 months ago

This is a tricky one. I know the general partitioning rule, but I'm not sure what the specific exceptions are. I'll have to read through the options carefully and try to reason through which one would cause the rule to not apply.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

9 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key always goes to the same partition unless something changes the partitioning, like the number of producers, brokers, or partitions. I'll double-check the options to make sure I have the right exception.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the partitioning rule, but I'm not sure what the exceptions would be. I'll have to carefully consider each of the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

9 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about Kafka partitioning. I'll need to think through the different scenarios where the "same key goes to the same partition" rule might not apply.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nikita

9 months ago

I think the key point is that the loss was recorded in May, so it shouldn't affect the quarterly income statement for June, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

1 year ago

Wait, does the answer involve a quantum entanglement between the producers and the Kafka gods? That would be a plot twist!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

1 year ago

Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser. I'm gonna have to go with A just to be different!

upvoted 0 times

Norah

1 year ago

I'm sticking with A, the number of producer changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

1 year ago

I believe it's C, the number of partition changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

1 year ago

I think the answer is D, the replication factor changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Kaycee

1 year ago

Ooh, tricky one! I'm going to go with D. The replication factor changing could mess up the partitioning, right?

upvoted 0 times

Alba

1 year ago

User 3: Agreed, D seems like the most logical choice in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josphine

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, changing the replication factor could definitely affect the partitioning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Danica

1 year ago

User 1: I think D is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Rex

1 year ago

Hmm, I was thinking B might be the right answer. After all, if the number of brokers changes, the partitioning would need to be recalculated.

upvoted 0 times

Shaun

1 year ago

D) the replication factor changes

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

1 year ago

C) the number of partition changes

upvoted 0 times

...

Maynard

1 year ago

B) the number of kafka broker changes

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

1 year ago

A) the number of producer changes

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Tora

1 year ago

But what if the number of kafka brokers changes? Wouldn't that also impact the partitioning?

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

1 year ago

I'd say the answer is C. Changing the number of partitions would definitely affect the partitioning rule.

upvoted 0 times

Emilio

1 year ago

D) the replication factor changes

upvoted 0 times

...

Phuong

1 year ago

C) the number of partition changes

upvoted 0 times

...

Annelle

1 year ago

B) the number of kafka broker changes

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

1 year ago

A) the number of producer changes

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Sang

1 year ago

I agree with Annice, changing the replication factor would affect the partitioning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

1 year ago

I think the answer is D) the replication factor changes.

upvoted 0 times

...