New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Confluent CCDAK Exam - Topic 1 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Confluent's CCDAK exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 1
[All CCDAK Questions]

Which actions will trigger partition rebalance for a consumer group? (select three)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

metadata is stored in and built from the KSQL command topic. Each KSQL server has its own in-memory version of the metastore.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sarah
3 months ago
Adding a consumer always triggers it, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
3 months ago
I agree with A and C, but not sure about B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
3 months ago
Wait, removing a broker causes a rebalance? That's wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
4 months ago
I think D is also a trigger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
4 months ago
Definitely A, B, and C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think both adding a new consumer and removing a broker are correct, but I’m not entirely sure about the last option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
4 months ago
I feel like increasing partitions should definitely trigger a rebalance, but I’m a bit confused about the shutdown of a consumer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
4 months ago
I think removing a broker might cause a rebalance too, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned in the practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
5 months ago
I remember that adding a new consumer to the group definitely triggers a rebalance, but I'm not sure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
5 months ago
I feel good about A, B, and D as the correct answers. Not sure about C though - does a new consumer really trigger a rebalance? I'll make a note to research that before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the "add a new consumer to the group" option. Does that really trigger a rebalance? I'll have to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. Increasing partitions, removing a broker, and a consumer in the group shutting down should all trigger a rebalance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. Partitions changing and brokers being added or removed would definitely cause a rebalance, that makes sense. The consumer group aspect is the tricky part, but I think adding a new consumer is the right answer there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the STIX format. I'll need to refresh my memory on the key elements before I can confidently answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
pg_upgrade might be an option, but I'm not sure if that's specifically for Alibaba Cloud migrations. I'll have to think through the details on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key here is that the attacker is trying to gain physical access to the organization, so it has to be an "in person" type of attack. That rules out the other options, so I'm confident A is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
9 months ago
Partition rebalancing, huh? Sounds like my high school gym class. Always gotta be switching teams and rearranging the lineups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
10 months ago
Wait, so increasing partitions doesn't automatically rebalance the group? Kafka, you're full of surprises! Better memorize these three triggers for the exam.
upvoted 0 times
Marilynn
8 months ago
D) A consumer in a consumer group shuts down
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
8 months ago
C) Add a new consumer to consumer group
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
9 months ago
A) Increase partitions of a topic
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
9 months ago
D) A consumer in a consumer group shuts down
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
9 months ago
C) Add a new consumer to consumer group
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
9 months ago
A) Increase partitions of a topic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
10 months ago
I agree with that. And when a consumer in a consumer group shuts down, it will also trigger partition rebalance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
10 months ago
Aha! I knew those were the right answers. Partition rebalancing is such a key part of Kafka consumer group management. Can't believe anyone would think adding a broker would trigger it.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
9 months ago
D) A consumer in a consumer group shuts down
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
10 months ago
C) Add a new consumer to consumer group
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
10 months ago
A) Increase partitions of a topic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
11 months ago
Ha! I almost picked C, but then I remembered that adding a new consumer doesn't necessarily mean the partitions will be rebalanced. Gotta think this one through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
Hmm, I think B, D, and E are the correct answers. Increasing partitions and adding a consumer should trigger a rebalance, and removing a broker or a consumer dropping out would definitely do it too.
upvoted 0 times
Bonita
9 months ago
Ashton: Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
10 months ago
User 3: I agree with Jules, A, C, and D trigger partition rebalance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
10 months ago
User 2: No, it's actually A, C, and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
10 months ago
User 1: I think B, D, and E are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mable
11 months ago
I believe adding a new consumer to the consumer group will also trigger partition rebalance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
11 months ago
I think increasing partitions of a topic will trigger partition rebalance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel