A data scientist is clustering a data set but does not want to specify the number of clusters present. Which of the following algorithms should the data scientist use?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium DY0-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
DBSCAN discovers clusters based on density without requiring you to predefine the number of clusters, automatically finding arbitrarily shaped groups and identifying noise points.
21 comments · newest first
AD
Adria
18 days ago
Right! Plus, it’s great for large datasets.
MA
Madelyn
23 days ago
I feel confident about DBSCAN. It handles noise well.
ER
Eric
28 days ago
Exactly! Logistic regression isn't even for clustering.
ED
Edison
1 month ago
K-means is out for this question. It needs the number of clusters specified.
PO
Pok
1 month ago
Yeah, I agree! DBSCAN can find clusters of varying shapes too.
SU
Sue
1 month ago
I think DBSCAN is the best choice here. It doesn't require the number of clusters.
SH
Sharmaine
2 months ago
K-nearest neighbors isn't a clustering algorithm. Just a classification tool.
YO
Yong
2 months ago
I feel confident about DBSCAN. It’s flexible and efficient.
CE
Cecilia
2 months ago
Exactly! Logistic regression isn't even for clustering.
TI
Tiffiny
2 months ago
K-means requires the number of clusters. Not suitable here.
EL
Elsa
2 months ago
Agreed! DBSCAN handles noise well too.
KA
Kayleigh
2 months ago
I think DBSCAN is the best choice. It finds clusters without needing a preset number.
JO
Johnson
3 months ago
Not sure about that, k-nearest neighbors seems more reliable.
SH
Sharen
3 months ago
Wait, can DBSCAN really work without knowing the number of clusters?
SH
Shalon
3 months ago
Totally agree, DBSCAN handles varying cluster sizes well.
ED
Edelmira
3 months ago
I thought k-means was the standard for clustering?
ME
Merri
3 months ago
DBSCAN is the way to go for that!
ER
Erin
4 months ago
Logistic regression seems out of place here since it's more for classification, not clustering.
JU
Junita
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and I think it was about density-based clustering, which points to DBSCAN.
EL
Elbert
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember k-means requires you to define the number of clusters, so it can't be the answer.
CA
Carlota
5 months ago
I think DBSCAN is the right choice since it can find clusters without needing to specify the number of them upfront.