Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA DY0-001 Exam - Topic 5 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Sheridan on May 07, 2026 at 11:35 AM

A data scientist is clustering a data set but does not want to specify the number of clusters present. Which of the following algorithms should the data scientist use?

Suggested Answer: A

DBSCAN discovers clusters based on density without requiring you to predefine the number of clusters, automatically finding arbitrarily shaped groups and identifying noise points.


Get Premium DY0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
AD
Adria 18 days ago
Right! Plus, it’s great for large datasets.
MA
Madelyn 23 days ago
I feel confident about DBSCAN. It handles noise well.
ER
Eric 28 days ago
Exactly! Logistic regression isn't even for clustering.
ED
Edison 1 month ago
K-means is out for this question. It needs the number of clusters specified.
PO
Pok 1 month ago
Yeah, I agree! DBSCAN can find clusters of varying shapes too.
SU
Sue 1 month ago
I think DBSCAN is the best choice here. It doesn't require the number of clusters.
SH
Sharmaine 2 months ago
K-nearest neighbors isn't a clustering algorithm. Just a classification tool.
YO
Yong 2 months ago
I feel confident about DBSCAN. It’s flexible and efficient.
CE
Cecilia 2 months ago
Exactly! Logistic regression isn't even for clustering.
TI
Tiffiny 2 months ago
K-means requires the number of clusters. Not suitable here.
EL
Elsa 2 months ago
Agreed! DBSCAN handles noise well too.
KA
Kayleigh 2 months ago
I think DBSCAN is the best choice. It finds clusters without needing a preset number.
JO
Johnson 3 months ago
Not sure about that, k-nearest neighbors seems more reliable.
SH
Sharen 3 months ago
Wait, can DBSCAN really work without knowing the number of clusters?
SH
Shalon 3 months ago
Totally agree, DBSCAN handles varying cluster sizes well.
ED
Edelmira 3 months ago
I thought k-means was the standard for clustering?
ME
Merri 3 months ago
DBSCAN is the way to go for that!
ER
Erin 4 months ago
Logistic regression seems out of place here since it's more for classification, not clustering.
JU
Junita 5 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and I think it was about density-based clustering, which points to DBSCAN.
EL
Elbert 5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember k-means requires you to define the number of clusters, so it can't be the answer.
CA
Carlota 5 months ago
I think DBSCAN is the right choice since it can find clusters without needing to specify the number of them upfront.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel