New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA DS0-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's DS0-001 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All DS0-001 Questions]

A company wants to deploy a new application that will distribute the workload to five different database instances. The database administrator needs to ensure that, for each copy of the database, users are able to read and write data that will be synchronized across all of the instances.

Which of the following should the administrator use to achieve this objective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sabina
3 months ago
Wait, can all instances really sync like that? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
3 months ago
Failover clustering? Not really what they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
3 months ago
Log shipping won't work for real-time sync, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
I think availability groups are the better choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
Peer-to-peer replication is great for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
Log shipping is usually for backups and not real-time synchronization, right? I feel like it’s not the best fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
4 months ago
Failover clustering seems more about high availability rather than synchronization, so I’m hesitant to choose that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think availability groups were mentioned as a good option for synchronizing data across multiple databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
I think peer-to-peer replication might be the right choice since it allows for read and write operations across all instances, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Availability groups seem like the most appropriate solution here, as they provide high availability and data synchronization across multiple database replicas. I'll focus on understanding the key features of availability groups for this type of scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Peer-to-peer replication sounds like it could work, as it allows for bi-directional data synchronization across multiple instances. But I'll need to double-check the details on how that differs from availability groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
5 months ago
This looks like a classic database replication question. I think the key is to identify the right replication strategy that can distribute the workload and keep the data synchronized across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "users are able to read and write data that will be synchronized across all of the instances," so I'm not sure if a simple log shipping approach would work here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The production rates are numerical values, and the comparison between the lines indicates a ratio relationship. So this must be an example of ratio scale data. I'm confident that B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
10 months ago
I'm going with availability groups. It's the only option that specifically mentions synchronizing data across multiple instances. Plus, it has a cool name - makes it sound fancy and high-tech!
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
8 months ago
Yeah, availability groups definitely sound like the most advanced and efficient solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
8 months ago
I agree, availability groups seem like the most reliable choice for distributing the workload and keeping data synchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
9 months ago
I think availability groups is the way to go too. It sounds like the best option for keeping everything in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
10 months ago
Failover clustering? Hmm, I don't think that's the right approach. We need something that can distribute the workload, not just provide failover.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
9 months ago
A: Exactly, that's what we need for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
9 months ago
B: Yeah, that makes sense. It will distribute the workload across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
9 months ago
A: I think we should use Availability groups for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
10 months ago
Log shipping? Really? That's more for disaster recovery, not for load distribution. I don't think that's the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Desiree
9 months ago
User 3: Peer-to-peer replication could also work well for distributing the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
9 months ago
User 2: Failover clustering might be a better option to ensure data synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
9 months ago
User 1: I think we should use availability groups for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tricia
10 months ago
Availability groups seem like the best fit for this scenario. They provide high availability and automatic failover, which is what the company is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Karima
9 months ago
Log shipping is not ideal for this situation since it does not provide automatic failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
Peer-to-peer replication could also work, but availability groups offer more features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
9 months ago
Failover clustering might not be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
10 months ago
Yes, availability groups provide the necessary high availability and failover capabilities for this deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
10 months ago
I agree, availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
10 months ago
I agree, availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Filiberto
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Peer-to-peer replication could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
10 months ago
I agree with Xuan, Availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
11 months ago
I think the administrator should use Availability groups to achieve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
11 months ago
Peer-to-peer replication sounds like the way to go here. Synchronizing data across multiple instances is exactly what that feature is designed for.
upvoted 0 times
Rachael
9 months ago
D: Definitely, it will ensure that data is synchronized across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
9 months ago
C: So, we should go with peer-to-peer replication to distribute the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
9 months ago
B: I agree, it's designed for synchronizing data across multiple instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
10 months ago
A: I think peer-to-peer replication is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel