Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CompTIA DS0-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

A company wants to deploy a new application that will distribute the workload to five different database instances. The database administrator needs to ensure that, for each copy of the database, users are able to read and write data that will be synchronized across all of the instances.Which of the following should the administrator use to achieve this objective?
B) Failover clustering
A) [Peer-to-peer replication
C) Log shipping
D) Availability groups

CompTIA DS0-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's DS0-001 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All DS0-001 Questions]

A company wants to deploy a new application that will distribute the workload to five different database instances. The database administrator needs to ensure that, for each copy of the database, users are able to read and write data that will be synchronized across all of the instances.

Which of the following should the administrator use to achieve this objective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The service that is responsible for assigning, managing, and reclaiming IP addresses on a TCP/IP-based network is DHCP. DHCP, or Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol, is a service that automatically assigns IP addresses and other network configuration parameters, such as subnet mask, default gateway, DNS server, etc., to computers or devices on a network. DHCP helps simplify the administration and management of IP addresses on a network, as well as avoid conflicts or errors caused by manual or duplicate assignments. DHCP also allows computers or devices to release or renew their IP addresses when they join or leave the network. The other options are either different services or not related to IP addresses at all. For example, DNS, or Domain Name System, is a service that translates domain names into IP addresses and vice versa; LDAP, or Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, is a service that provides access to directory information such as users, groups, or devices on a network; ISMTP is not a valid acronym or service.Reference:CompTIA DataSys+ Course Outline, Domain 2.0 Database Deployment, Objective 2.1 Given a scenario, select an appropriate database deployment method.


by Whitney at Sep 16, 2024, 02:14 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DS0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sabina
10 months ago
Wait, can all instances really sync like that? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
10 months ago
Failover clustering? Not really what they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
10 months ago
Log shipping won't work for real-time sync, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
I think availability groups are the better choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
11 months ago
Peer-to-peer replication is great for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
11 months ago
Log shipping is usually for backups and not real-time synchronization, right? I feel like it’s not the best fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
11 months ago
Failover clustering seems more about high availability rather than synchronization, so I’m hesitant to choose that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think availability groups were mentioned as a good option for synchronizing data across multiple databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
11 months ago
I think peer-to-peer replication might be the right choice since it allows for read and write operations across all instances, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
11 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Availability groups seem like the most appropriate solution here, as they provide high availability and data synchronization across multiple database replicas. I'll focus on understanding the key features of availability groups for this type of scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Peer-to-peer replication sounds like it could work, as it allows for bi-directional data synchronization across multiple instances. But I'll need to double-check the details on how that differs from availability groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
11 months ago
This looks like a classic database replication question. I think the key is to identify the right replication strategy that can distribute the workload and keep the data synchronized across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "users are able to read and write data that will be synchronized across all of the instances," so I'm not sure if a simple log shipping approach would work here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The production rates are numerical values, and the comparison between the lines indicates a ratio relationship. So this must be an example of ratio scale data. I'm confident that B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
I'm going with availability groups. It's the only option that specifically mentions synchronizing data across multiple instances. Plus, it has a cool name - makes it sound fancy and high-tech!
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
1 year ago
Yeah, availability groups definitely sound like the most advanced and efficient solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 year ago
I agree, availability groups seem like the most reliable choice for distributing the workload and keeping data synchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
1 year ago
I think availability groups is the way to go too. It sounds like the best option for keeping everything in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
1 year ago
Failover clustering? Hmm, I don't think that's the right approach. We need something that can distribute the workload, not just provide failover.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
1 year ago
A: Exactly, that's what we need for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
B: Yeah, that makes sense. It will distribute the workload across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
A: I think we should use Availability groups for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
1 year ago
Log shipping? Really? That's more for disaster recovery, not for load distribution. I don't think that's the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Desiree
1 year ago
User 3: Peer-to-peer replication could also work well for distributing the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
1 year ago
User 2: Failover clustering might be a better option to ensure data synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should use availability groups for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tricia
1 year ago
Availability groups seem like the best fit for this scenario. They provide high availability and automatic failover, which is what the company is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Karima
1 year ago
Log shipping is not ideal for this situation since it does not provide automatic failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 year ago
Peer-to-peer replication could also work, but availability groups offer more features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 year ago
Failover clustering might not be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
1 year ago
Yes, availability groups provide the necessary high availability and failover capabilities for this deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
1 year ago
I agree, availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
I agree, availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think Peer-to-peer replication could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
1 year ago
I agree with Xuan, Availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 year ago
I think the administrator should use Availability groups to achieve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
1 year ago
Peer-to-peer replication sounds like the way to go here. Synchronizing data across multiple instances is exactly what that feature is designed for.
upvoted 0 times
Rachael
1 year ago
D: Definitely, it will ensure that data is synchronized across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
1 year ago
C: So, we should go with peer-to-peer replication to distribute the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 year ago
B: I agree, it's designed for synchronizing data across multiple instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
1 year ago
A: I think peer-to-peer replication is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel