Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CloudBees CJE Exam - Topic 2 Question 118 Discussion

In a "standalone" configuration, when masters manage the build environment and also execute builds with their own resources, which of the following Is true?
B) User interface becomes slower as resources on the master run out.
A) Build times decrease.
C) The builds share SCM checkouts
D) Masters are more highly available.

CloudBees CJE Exam - Topic 2 Question 118 Discussion

Actual exam question for CloudBees's CJE exam
Question #: 118
Topic #: 2
[All CJE Questions]

In a "standalone" configuration, when masters manage the build environment and also execute builds with their own resources, which of the following Is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Joanna at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CJE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shenika
2 months ago
I lean towards C. Sharing SCM checkouts can speed things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
2 months ago
A could be true too. If managed well, build times might decrease.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
3 months ago
I agree, B makes sense. Limited resources slow everything down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
3 months ago
I think B is true. The UI can lag if the master is overloaded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
3 months ago
Wait, how does that even work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
3 months ago
D) Masters are more highly available? Not so sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
3 months ago
C) The builds share SCM checkouts? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
3 months ago
Totally agree with B) - I've seen it happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
4 months ago
A) Build times decrease. That's a fact!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
4 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I need more coffee to figure this one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
4 months ago
D) Masters are more highly available. Hmm, I'm not convinced that's true in a standalone setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
5 months ago
A) Build times decrease. I'm not sure about that, the master might become a bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
5 months ago
B) User interface becomes slower as resources on the master run out. That's a good point, the master can get overloaded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
5 months ago
C) The builds share SCM checkouts. This makes sense for a standalone configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that having masters manage everything can lead to higher availability, but I’m not confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether the builds actually share SCM checkouts in a standalone setup. I need to think that through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
5 months ago
I feel like I saw a question similar to this in practice, and it mentioned that the user interface could slow down if the master runs out of resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
6 months ago
I think I remember something about build times possibly decreasing, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
6 months ago
Hmm, I remember learning about standalone configurations. I think the key is that the masters are responsible for everything, so the builds would share checkouts, but the masters might not be as highly available since they're doing double duty. I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The user interface getting slower as resources run out on the master makes sense, but I'm not sure about the other options. Guess I'll have to eliminate the ones I'm unsure about and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
6 months ago
Alright, I've got this. In a standalone setup, the masters handle both the build environment and execution, so build times should actually decrease since there's no overhead from a separate executor. I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the builds sharing SCM checkouts is true, but I'm not sure about the other options. I'll need to review my notes on standalone configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the implications of a standalone configuration carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Fausto
10 days ago
C is interesting. Sharing SCM checkouts could save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
15 days ago
A could be true too. Less overhead might speed things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
2 months ago
I think B makes sense. Slower UI with limited resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel