In a "standalone" configuration, when masters manage the build environment and also execute builds with their own resources, which of the following Is true?
I feel like I saw a question similar to this in practice, and it mentioned that the user interface could slow down if the master runs out of resources.
Hmm, I remember learning about standalone configurations. I think the key is that the masters are responsible for everything, so the builds would share checkouts, but the masters might not be as highly available since they're doing double duty. I'll go with C.
I'm a bit confused on this one. The user interface getting slower as resources run out on the master makes sense, but I'm not sure about the other options. Guess I'll have to eliminate the ones I'm unsure about and hope for the best.
Alright, I've got this. In a standalone setup, the masters handle both the build environment and execution, so build times should actually decrease since there's no overhead from a separate executor. I'll go with A.
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the builds sharing SCM checkouts is true, but I'm not sure about the other options. I'll need to review my notes on standalone configurations.
Cordell
3 days agoLashaun
8 days agoCorazon
13 days agoJulio
18 days agoGerardo
24 days agoCherelle
29 days agoValentin
1 month agoEstrella
1 month agoMadalyn
1 month agoSylvie
2 months agoMarshall
2 months agoFlorinda
2 months ago