New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CloudBees CJE Exam - Topic 2 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for CloudBees's CJE exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 2
[All CJE Questions]

You need to grant permissions, via matrix-based security, to run a specific command in a Jenkins pipeline. The project parameters will not allow you to create a specific user to run this task, and you have no relevant groups. Which of the following is an option?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

You can set permissions for anonymous users with matrix-based security. Since this requires the least impact on existing workflows, it's the best solution.


by Rhea at Apr 03, 2025, 10:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CJE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leonard
2 months ago
Wait, can you really let anonymous users run commands? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 months ago
Totally agree with D, it makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
3 months ago
I think D is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
3 months ago
A and B are not possible since we can't create a user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
3 months ago
Option C seems risky, allowing anonymous users?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
3 months ago
I thought setting permissions for anonymous users was risky, but it might be the only way if we can't create a group or user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
4 months ago
I feel like changing the workflow to require an existing user might be a solution, but I can't recall if that's the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and creating a group seemed like the right approach, but we can't create one here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
4 months ago
I remember something about matrix-based security, but I'm not sure if allowing anonymous users is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
4 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Option B is definitely the right choice - it's the only one that allows you to use an existing user without creating a new one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Option B is the way to go - create a group, add an existing user to it, and grant permissions to that group. Seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure if setting permissions for anonymous users is a good idea, but I'll have to think about it more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if creating a group or reassigning the user will work, but option B looks like the best approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
10 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if we could just bribe the Jenkins admin to create a new user for us. That would be a lot easier than all this security nonsense.
upvoted 0 times
Lonna
8 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if we could just bribe the Jenkins admin to create a new user for us. That would be a lot easier than all this security nonsense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
9 months ago
B) Create a group, add an existing user to the task, and grant permissions to that group
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
9 months ago
A) Either creating a group or reassigning the user will work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willie
10 months ago
That's a good point, Winifred. Option D does provide more control over who can run the command. It's important to consider security implications when setting up permissions in Jenkins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
10 months ago
Option A? Really? That's like saying 'I can either fix the flat tire or just get a new car.' Not very helpful.
upvoted 0 times
Claudio
9 months ago
D) Change the workflow to require an existing user to run the task, and assign permissions to that user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
9 months ago
B) Create a group, add an existing user to the task, and grant permissions to that group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Winifred
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go. Requiring an existing user to run the task ensures accountability and assigning permissions directly to that user is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
10 months ago
Option D could work, but it might be a hassle to have to assign permissions to a specific user every time. Option B is probably the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
Gregoria
9 months ago
Either creating a group or reassigning the user will work, so that's good to know.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
10 months ago
Creating a group and adding an existing user seems like the most efficient way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
10 months ago
I agree, Option B is probably the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
10 months ago
Option D could work, but it might be a hassle to have to assign permissions to a specific user every time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alona
10 months ago
I agree with Anastacia. Option B is the way to go here. Trying to use an anonymous user (Option C) sounds risky from a security standpoint.
upvoted 0 times
Raelene
10 months ago
I agree, creating a group and adding an existing user seems like the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
10 months ago
I think Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willie
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Creating a group and adding an existing user seems like the most secure way to handle permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
11 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution. Creating a group and adding an existing user to it makes sense when you can't create a new user.
upvoted 0 times
Weldon
9 months ago
Definitely. It's a workaround that can be effective in granting the necessary permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
9 months ago
That's a good point. It's a practical way to handle permissions in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
9 months ago
Creating a group and adding an existing user to it makes sense when you can't create a new user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
9 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
9 months ago
Definitely. It's a workaround that can be effective in granting the necessary permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
9 months ago
That's a good point. It's a practical way to handle permissions in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
10 months ago
Creating a group and adding an existing user to it makes sense when you can't create a new user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
10 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel