MENU
Which of the following is not a best practice when using JavaScript libraries?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 1D0-735 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
GE
Genevive
6 months ago
True, but B is common practice. It’s about balance, I guess.
VI
Viki
6 months ago
I vote for B. Loading scripts in the head can slow down the page.
AB
Abel
6 months ago
But D helps in optimizing. It’s good to master one library.
JE
Jesse
7 months ago
I feel like D is also risky. Focusing too much on one can limit flexibility.
FA
Fatima
7 months ago
Agreed, C can lead to compatibility problems. Stick to one library!
CO
Corrina
7 months ago
Linking scripts in the is standard practice, so B is fine.
VA
Vashti
7 months ago
Wait, is it really a problem to use multiple libraries? Sounds risky.
ST
Stevie
8 months ago
I agree with C being a bad idea. Stick to one library!
VI
Vilma
8 months ago
C is definitely not a best practice. Mixing libraries can cause issues.
JA
Jackie
8 months ago
Developers should use a random number generator to pick their libraries. That's the real best practice.
RO
Rory
8 months ago
C is a big no-no. Mixing libraries is a recipe for disaster.
LA
Lashandra
8 months ago
D is the way to go. Specializing in one library is the key to optimization.
JU
Junita
9 months ago
Linking to the library in the head section? What is this, the 90s?
AD
Adelina
9 months ago
A, B, and D are best practices. C is not.
LU
Luisa
9 months ago
I thought cross-browser compatibility was crucial, so option A seems right. But linking scripts in the head... I’m not so confident about that.
PR
Providencia
9 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about optimizing for a specific library, which makes me lean towards option D being a best practice.
CL
Clemencia
9 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is to focus on one library and optimize for that, rather than trying to use a bunch of different ones. The other options seem like they could lead to problems.
MI
Milly
9 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know we should use compatible libraries, but I'm not sure about the specifics of where to link them or using multiple libraries. Gotta review my notes on best practices.
LA
Larae
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident that linking the library and plugins in the head is a good practice. And we definitely want to ensure cross-browser compatibility. The other options seem less ideal.
CA
Candida
10 months ago
I feel like using plugins from different libraries, like in option C, could lead to conflicts. That seems risky!
HU
Huey
10 months ago
I think option B might be the one that's not a best practice, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about script placement affecting load times.
CR
Cristal
10 months ago
I think option C is not a best practice. Mixing libraries can cause issues.
PH
Phuong
10 months ago
A is super important! Cross-browser compatibility is key.
VE
Vesta
11 months ago
Hmm, I think the best practice is to use one library and optimize for that, rather than mixing libraries. The other options seem like they could cause compatibility issues.
HE
Hester
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I know we should use libraries that are compatible with the HTML version, but I'm not sure about the other options.
TA
Tawna
5 months ago
Definitely! Cross-browser compatibility is crucial too.
JO
Joanna
5 months ago
Option B seems fine to me. Head section is the right place.
JA
Jannette
6 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Sticking to one library is safer.
FE
Fernanda
6 months ago
I think option C is not a best practice. Mixing plugins can cause issues.
GA
Gayla
11 months ago
I’m confused about D. Isn’t it good to know multiple libraries?