New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIW 1D0-541 Exam - Topic 3 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIW's 1D0-541 exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 3
[All 1D0-541 Questions]

Consider the Stu_Act and Act_Fee tables shown in the exhibit. Which relational algebraic

operation would yield the Activity Relation table in the exhibit?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Janet at Mar 04, 2025, 03:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1D0-541 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kris
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Looks tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
3 months ago
I agree, natural join makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
3 months ago
Union seems like a good choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
3 months ago
Definitely not a Cartesian product!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
4 months ago
I think it's a natural join.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
4 months ago
I recall something about intersection, but it doesn't seem like that's what we're looking for in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
4 months ago
I feel like the activity relation table is showing a combination of attributes, so maybe it's a Cartesian product?
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember practicing a question where union was used. This feels different though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
4 months ago
I think we might need to use a natural join here since we're combining related data from both tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
I think the natural join operation is the way to go here. The tables have a common attribute (Activity_ID), and the desired output looks like it's combining the information from both tables. I'm pretty confident in this approach, but I'll still double-check my work before submitting the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
5 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on this one. The tables and the desired output are clear, but I'm struggling to remember the specific relational algebra operations and how they work. I'll need to review my notes and examples to try and figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking for the relational algebra operation that would yield the Activity Relation table. Based on the information provided, I'm leaning towards the natural join operation. But I'll double-check my work to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The tables seem simple enough, but I'm not entirely sure which relational algebra operation would give me the desired result. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward relational algebra question. I think the key is to carefully examine the tables and the desired output to determine the appropriate operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Based on the information provided, I think a natural join is the way to go. The tables seem to be related by the Activity ID, so that should give us the desired result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key is to identify the relationship between the two tables and the desired output. I think a natural join might be the way to go, but I'll double-check the definitions of the other operations just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The tables seem simple enough, but I'm not entirely confident in my understanding of the different relational algebra operations. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward relational algebra question. I'm going to carefully review the tables and think through the different operations to determine which one would yield the desired result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
10 months ago
The natural join is the way to go. It's like a secret handshake between the tables, making sure they only share the relevant information. Very clever, this one!
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
9 months ago
User 3: Making sure they only share the relevant information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's like a secret handshake between the tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
9 months ago
User 1: I think the natural join is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trinidad
10 months ago
Ah, the natural join, of course! It's like the perfect dance between the two tables, where they come together seamlessly. I can almost hear the music playing in the background.
upvoted 0 times
Linsey
9 months ago
User 4: It's like music playing in the background.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
User 3: It's true, they come together seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
10 months ago
User 2: Yes, the natural join is like a perfect dance between the tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
10 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is C) Natural join.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe the Cartesian product would work, but that might give us more data than we need. I'll have to think this one through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
10 months ago
The natural join operation would be the correct answer here. It combines the related data from the Stu_Act and Act_Fee tables based on the common attributes.
upvoted 0 times
Isaiah
9 months ago
The natural join operation would be the correct answer here. It combines the related data from the Stu_Act and Act_Fee tables based on the common attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
9 months ago
D) Cartesian product
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
9 months ago
C) Natural join
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
10 months ago
B) Intersection
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
10 months ago
A) Union
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gertude
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Cartesian product could also work if we want all possible combinations of rows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
I agree with Marion, because we need to combine the tables based on a common attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) Natural join.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel