I feel like I might be confusing this with ON DELETE CASCADE. I just can't recall if NO ACTION means it does nothing or if it prevents deletion like option C suggests.
I practiced a question similar to this, and I remember that ON DELETE NO ACTION prevents deletion of the parent if there are existing child references. So, I think option C is correct.
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about referential integrity constraints. I think it might be related to option C, but I could be mixing it up with another type of constraint.
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The image is complex, and the options all sound plausible. I'll need to rely on my network security knowledge to make an informed decision.
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if any of these options would actually improve the stability and reliability. I'll need to review the course material again before answering.
Definitely B. NO ACTION means the database doesn't do anything special when deleting the parent key. It's up to the application to handle the referential integrity.
Haha, I almost picked D just for the fun of it. Automatically setting all child keys to a specified value? That's a bit extreme for a 'NO ACTION' constraint!
I think the correct answer is B. The question clearly states 'NO ACTION', which means no test is made for referential integrity when deleting the parent key.
Amina
5 months agoCheryl
5 months agoHoa
5 months agoNa
5 months agoDaniela
5 months agoLarae
6 months agoCristen
6 months agoGwen
6 months agoDevorah
6 months agoChauncey
6 months agoCruz
6 months agoCorazon
6 months agoBrandee
11 months agoLavelle
9 months agoRochell
9 months agoWilliam
9 months agoRuby
10 months agoCherelle
10 months agoShizue
10 months agoDesiree
11 months agoMel
11 months agoPrecious
11 months agoRyan
11 months agoVerlene
11 months agoYolande
11 months agoJusta
10 months agoDortha
11 months agoJames
11 months agoAnnice
11 months agoTarra
11 months agoNickole
11 months agoGladys
12 months agoRyan
12 months ago