Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-403 Topic 9 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-403 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 9
[All 1Y0-403 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Architect is redesigning a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment to include Machine Creation Services (MCS). During design discussions, the locations for the MCS-provisioned thin clone machine disks are proposed as shown in the exhibit.

Click the Exhibit button to view the details.

Which two potential issues should the architect address with the customer before proceeding with this configuration? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Eva
12 days ago
This question is really cooking up some interesting discussion. I wonder if the architect has considered using a pressure cooker to speed up the machine provisioning process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
16 days ago
I'm just hoping they don't store the machines in the same shared location as the cafeteria's lunch leftovers. That would be a real disaster!
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
20 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure Option A is a real issue. I thought MCS worked with various hypervisors these days. But Option E could be a problem if we need to allocate more storage on the VM hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 months ago
I agree with Keena, but Option D is also a valid concern. The read IOPS required during machine creation and updates could be a bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
Junita
4 days ago
Definitely, it's important to ensure the environment can handle the storage requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
9 days ago
Agreed, both Option B and Option D are important factors to address with the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
10 days ago
I think we should also consider Option B. Substantial write IOPS to the shared storage location could be an issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
10 days ago
Yes, that could be a concern. We should also consider the read IOPS during machine creation and updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
22 days ago
I agree, the write IOPS to the shared storage location could be substantial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
23 days ago
Option D is definitely a valid concern. The read IOPS could be a bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
27 days ago
I think we should address the potential issues with the customer before proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keena
1 months ago
Option B seems to be the most concerning issue here. The substantial write IOPS to the shared storage location could significantly impact performance and user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
2 months ago
I believe we should also consider the need for more storage on VM hosts compared to other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
I agree with Nina. It could impact performance if not addressed properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
2 months ago
I think the potential issue with substantial write IOPS to shared storage is a concern.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel