MENU
Scenario: A Citrix Engineer reviewed the log files of a web application and found the error message below: "Unable to complete request Unrecognized field cext2_price>" Which protection can the engineer implement to prevent this error from happening?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 1Y0-341 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
TO
Torie
11 months ago
Not sure if XSS is related to this error at all.
RA
Rasheeda
11 months ago
Form Field Consistency seems like the best choice.
TE
Terrilyn
11 months ago
Surprised that HTML SQL Injection is even an option!
MA
Marguerita
12 months ago
I think CSRF is more relevant here, though.
ER
Ernie
12 months ago
Definitely need Form Field Consistency to avoid that error.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
I feel like HTML SQL Injection could be a potential answer, but I don't recall it being directly linked to unrecognized fields.
SO
Sonia
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think CSRF was mentioned, but it doesn't seem to fit this scenario.
ME
Melita
1 year ago
This kind of error seems like it could be related to input validation, so I think form field consistency might be the right choice here.
JA
Janna
1 year ago
I remember studying form field consistency, but I'm not entirely sure how it relates to this specific error message.
JA
Jamie
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think the best approach would be to create/edit a component for the widgets, that way I can maintain them in one place and update them across the dashboards.
WH
Whitley
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is to focus on the specific requirement for the summary of significant accounting policies, rather than just general financial statement disclosures. I'll carefully consider each option against that criteria.
KI
King
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know hexadecimal codes are used to represent colors, but I can't quite remember how to interpret the FF0000 code. I'll have to think this through carefully.
LO
Lon
1 year ago
I feel like "authoring" was mentioned in our discussions, but that doesn't fit this question at all.
MA
Marg
1 year ago
Wait, is the answer 'E) Turn it off and on again'? That's my go-to solution for any tech problem!
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
D) HTML Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - aha, that's the one! Protecting against XSS vulnerabilities should help prevent this kind of error.
EL
Elbert
1 year ago
D) HTML Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - aha, that's the one! Protecting against XSS vulnerabilities should help prevent this kind of error.
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
D) HTML Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
C) HTML SQL Injection
SA
Sabine
1 year ago
B) Cross-Site Request Forgeries (CSRF)
ME
Merlyn
1 year ago
A) Form Field Consistency
ER
Erick
1 year ago
Hmm, C) HTML SQL Injection - that seems a bit off, this error is about an unrecognized field, not SQL injection.
GA
Gabriele
1 year ago
B) Cross-Site Request Forgeries (CSRF) - really? I thought that was more about unauthorized access, not this specific error.
MA
Maddie
1 year ago
C) HTML SQL Injection
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
B) Cross-Site Request Forgeries (CSRF)
TA
Tayna
1 year ago
A) Form Field Consistency
MA
Mabelle
2 years ago
A) Form Field Consistency - that's gotta be it! Keeping those form fields consistent is key to preventing this kind of error.
CH
Chana
1 year ago
B) Cross-Site Request Forgeries (CSRF) - CSRF protection is important too, but in this case, form field consistency is the key.
EV
Evelynn
1 year ago
A) Form Field Consistency - Yes, keeping the form fields consistent can help prevent errors like this.
GI
Giovanna
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D) HTML Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) could also be a good choice.
KR
Kristine
2 years ago
I agree with Sunshine. Form Field Consistency can help prevent errors like this.
SU
Sunshine
2 years ago
I think the engineer should go with option A) Form Field Consistency.