Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix 1Y0-241 Exam - Topic 9 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 9
[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

How can a Citrix Administrator configure a rewrite policy to change the version of HTTP from 1.1 to 1.0 in every request?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lashawnda
4 months ago
Isn't HTTP/1.0 outdated though?
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
4 months ago
Totally agree with D, it makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
4 months ago
Wait, why would you downgrade to HTTP/1.0?
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
4 months ago
I think B is more relevant for requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
5 months ago
Option D is the correct one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
5 months ago
I feel like option A is close, but it mentions the response version instead of the request. I think we definitely need to focus on the request for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should be looking at the request or response version. I thought it was the response version, but now I’m not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think we want to replace the HTTP request version, which makes me lean towards option D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
5 months ago
I think we need to change the request version, so it might be option D, but I'm not entirely sure about the syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
I'm confident that option D is the correct answer here. Replacing the http.req.version with 'HTTPS/1.0' will change the request to use HTTP 1.0 instead of 1.1.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We need to change the HTTP version from 1.1 to 1.0, so the key is figuring out which version we need to target in the rewrite action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Citrix rewrite policy question. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the difference between http.req.version and http.res.version. I'll need to double-check that before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. The structural perspective is about the components and their relationships, so I'm thinking the entity-relationship diagram and the class diagram are the two that best fit that description. I'll go with those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
6 months ago
Okay, let me see here. Charities are non-profit organizations, so paying dividends to shareholders doesn't make sense. I'll select that as my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if I should use a Quick Style, Mail Merge, building blocks, or a template. I'll have to review the options carefully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
10 months ago
I bet the person who wrote this question is sipping a piña colada on a beach somewhere, laughing at our confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
10 months ago
If this was a Citrix administrator's version of 'Choose Your Own Adventure', I'd be lost in the woods by now.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnee
9 months ago
B) > add rewrite policy RW_POL true RW_ACT
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
9 months ago
A) > add rewrite policy RW_POL true RW_ACT
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
9 months ago
B) >add rewrite action RW_ACT replace http.req.version ''\\''HTTPS/1.1\\''''
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
10 months ago
A) >add rewrite action RW_ACT replace http.res.version ''\\''HTTPS/1.0\\''''
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lizbeth
11 months ago
Wow, this question really has me stumped. I'm going to have to go with my gut and choose option B. Fingers crossed!
upvoted 0 times
Mirta
9 months ago
User 4: I'm going to choose option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
9 months ago
User 3: Option C seems like the right choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
10 months ago
User 2: I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
11 months ago
User 1: I think I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaac
11 months ago
Hold on, I think I've got it! We need to change the request version, not the response. Option D looks like the winner to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Shouldn't we be modifying the request version instead of the response? I'm leaning towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
11 months ago
But changing the request version to 1.0 should be done in http.req.version, so I still think A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one! I think I got it - we need to use the 'replace' command to change the HTTP version in the response, not the request. Let's go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
Lemuel
10 months ago
User 4: Great choice! Option A it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
10 months ago
User 3: Sounds good to me. Option A it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Let's go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
11 months ago
User 1: I think we should use the 'replace' command to change the HTTP version in the response.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laura
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
12 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel