Scenario:
POLICY 1:
add rewrite action ACT_1 corrupt_http_header Accept-Encoding
add rewrite policy POL_1 HTTPS.REQ.IS_VALID ACT_1
POLICY 2:
add rewrite action ACT_2 insert_http_header Accept-Encoding ''\''identity\''''
add rewrite policy POL_2 ''HTTP.REQ.IS_VALID '' ACT_2
How can a Citrix Administrator successfully bind the above rewrite policies to the load-balancing vServer
lb_vsrv so that POL_2 is evaluated after POL_2 is evaluated?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 1Y0-241 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
HE
Heike
11 months ago
Isn't it weird that they both use the same type? Just saying.
AL
Alise
11 months ago
Totally agree with B, makes the most sense!
LI
Lillian
11 months ago
Wait, why would you use NEXT for POL_2? Seems off.
YO
Youlanda
11 months ago
I think option B is the right choice!
VI
Viola
12 months ago
POL_1 should have a higher priority than POL_2.
JE
Jettie
12 months ago
I vaguely recall that using NEXT in the gotoPriorityExpression allows the next policy to run, but I can't remember if END would skip it entirely.
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the priority numbers. Shouldn't POL_1 have a higher priority than POL_2 to ensure it runs first?
AR
Art
1 year ago
I think we practiced something similar where we had to bind policies in a specific order. I feel like POL_2 should definitely come after POL_1.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
I remember that the priority determines the order of policy evaluation, but I'm not sure if the gotoPriorityExpression affects that too.
MA
Ma
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and the options to figure out the right approach.
SH
Sheron
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the terminology of events and outcomes. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the precise definitions to select the correct answer.
JO
Joanne
1 year ago
Okay, this looks straightforward enough. I'll use the Falco rule you provided as a starting point, but I might need to tweak it a bit to get the output in the right format. And I'll make sure to save the incident file on the worker node as specified.
GE
Geoffrey
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a CORS issue. I'd try enabling CORS to see if that resolves the error.