Citrix 1Y0-241 Exam - Topic 5 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 5

[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

Scenario:

POLICY 1:

add rewrite action ACT_1 corrupt_http_header Accept-Encoding

add rewrite policy POL_1 HTTPS.REQ.IS_VALID ACT_1

POLICY 2:

add rewrite action ACT_2 insert_http_header Accept-Encoding ''\''identity\''''

add rewrite policy POL_2 ''HTTP.REQ.IS_VALID '' ACT_2

How can a Citrix Administrator successfully bind the above rewrite policies to the load-balancing vServer

lb_vsrv so that POL_2 is evaluated after POL_2 is evaluated?

Abind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_1 --priority 110 --gotoPriorityExpression NEXT --type REQUEST
bind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_2 --priority 100 --gotoPriorityExpression END --type REQUEST

Bbind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_1 --priority 90 --gotoPriorityExpression NEXT --type REQUEST
bind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_2 --priority 100 --gotoPriorityExpression END --type REQUEST

Cbind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_1 --priority 90 --gotoPriorityExpression END --type REQUEST
bind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_2 --priority 80 --gotoPriorityExpression NEXT --type REQUEST

Dbind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_1 --priority 90 --type REQUEST
bind lb vServer lb_vsrv --policyName POL_2 --priority 100 --type REQUEST

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Ryan at May 04, 2022, 03:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-241 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Heike

6 months ago

Isn't it weird that they both use the same type? Just saying.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alise

6 months ago

Totally agree with B, makes the most sense!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

6 months ago

Wait, why would you use NEXT for POL_2? Seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

6 months ago

I think option B is the right choice!

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

6 months ago

POL_1 should have a higher priority than POL_2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

7 months ago

I vaguely recall that using NEXT in the gotoPriorityExpression allows the next policy to run, but I can't remember if END would skip it entirely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammara

7 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the priority numbers. Shouldn't POL_1 have a higher priority than POL_2 to ensure it runs first?

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

7 months ago

I think we practiced something similar where we had to bind policies in a specific order. I feel like POL_2 should definitely come after POL_1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

7 months ago

I remember that the priority determines the order of policy evaluation, but I'm not sure if the gotoPriorityExpression affects that too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ma

7 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and the options to figure out the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

7 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about the terminology of events and outcomes. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the precise definitions to select the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanne

7 months ago

Okay, this looks straightforward enough. I'll use the Falco rule you provided as a starting point, but I might need to tweak it a bit to get the output in the right format. And I'll make sure to save the incident file on the worker node as specified.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

8 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a CORS issue. I'd try enabling CORS to see if that resolves the error.

upvoted 0 times

...