Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 820-605 Exam - Topic 12 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 820-605 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 12
[All 820-605 Questions]

The Chief Information Officer (CIO) of a bank and their vendor have a significant disagreement over the value of the work that was delivered the past two years under the existing managed-services contract. The contract renewal process was delayed for over three months, with considerable risk to both parties. Which best practice will help prevent this type of disagreement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vallie
4 months ago
Clear IT strategy is essential, but timing matters too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
4 months ago
Surprised this disagreement even happened!
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
4 months ago
Not sure a third-party mediator is the best route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
5 months ago
Totally agree, KPIs should be front and center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
5 months ago
A proactive review of service performance is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
5 months ago
I think defining a clear IT strategy is important, but implementing suggestions immediately might not be realistic. Option D seems a bit rushed to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
5 months ago
Engaging a third-party mediator sounds like a good idea, but I can't recall if we covered that in detail. Option C might help, but it feels a bit complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
5 months ago
I feel like having the CSM define value measurement is crucial, but I wonder if that could lead to bias. Option B seems like a solid choice, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
6 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of KPIs in our last class. I think option A makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the only solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward enough. I'm leaning towards option A - adopting a lifecycle approach with regular performance reviews. That seems like the best way to stay on top of things and avoid the kind of disagreement described. I'll make sure to give that one some serious consideration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to have a proactive, lifecycle-based approach to managing the vendor relationship, as outlined in option A. That way, you can stay on top of performance and value throughout the contract, rather than waiting until the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
6 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I can see the merit in having a third-party mediator involved, as suggested in option C. That could help keep things objective and prevent the kind of dispute described. I'll make sure to consider that option closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. There are a few different approaches mentioned, and I'm not sure which one would be the most effective in preventing this type of disagreement. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about managing vendor relationships. I think the key is to have a structured approach to evaluating performance and value, so option A looks like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
1 year ago
Looks like the CIO and the vendor need to work on their communication skills. Maybe they can settle this over a game of ping-pong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
B is interesting, but I wonder if the vendor will actually agree to that. Might as well just arm wrestle for the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
1 year ago
D? Really? The CIO should focus on strategy, not micromanaging the contract execution. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
1 year ago
Agreed, having a third-party mediator can help ensure both parties are on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
1 year ago
C) Engage a third-party mediator to develop contract goals and evaluate the objectives at regular intervals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
A) Adopt a lifecycle approach with a proactive review of service performance against KPIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benedict
1 year ago
I believe engaging a third-party mediator could also help in evaluating contract goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
1 year ago
C is the best option. A third-party mediator can bring an unbiased perspective to the table. Saves a lot of headaches.
upvoted 0 times
Kati
1 year ago
D) Have the CIO define a clear IT strategy and implement the suggestions immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
1 year ago
C) Engage a third-party mediator to develop contract goals and evaluate the objectives at regular intervals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 year ago
B) Have the CSM define how value should be measured at the end of the contract period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
1 year ago
A) Adopt a lifecycle approach with a proactive review of service performance against KPIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brice
1 year ago
I agree with Lavina, having a proactive review of service performance is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
1 year ago
I think option A is the best practice to prevent disagreements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
1 year ago
A lifecycle approach with KPIs is the way to go. Helps keep both parties on the same page and avoid surprises.
upvoted 0 times
Ernest
1 year ago
A lifecycle approach with KPIs is the way to go. Helps keep both parties on the same page and avoid surprises.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
1 year ago
C) Engage a third-party mediator to develop contract goals and evaluate the objectives at regular intervals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
1 year ago
A) Adopt a lifecycle approach with a proactive review of service performance against KPIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel