Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-710 Exam - Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Which statement about setting up a call bridge cluster for a resilient and scalable Cisco Meeting Server deployment is true?
A) Call bridges can connect to databases in full mesh.
B) Call bridges only connect to the master database.
C) Only one call bridge should be configured per domain in a database cluster.
D) Call bridges can read/write to any database in a cluster at anytime.

Cisco 500-710 Exam - Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-710 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 2
[All 500-710 Questions]

Which statement about setting up a call bridge cluster for a resilient and scalable Cisco Meeting Server deployment is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nikita
9 months ago
Wait, I thought they could only connect to the master database!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
9 months ago
D seems too good to be true, can they really write to any database?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
10 months ago
C sounds right, only one per domain makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
10 months ago
I disagree, B is misleading. They can connect to more than just the master.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
10 months ago
A is correct, call bridges can connect in full mesh.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 months ago
I believe call bridges can read/write to any database in the cluster, but I need to double-check that detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the database cluster setup. I thought there could be multiple call bridges per domain, but now I'm not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think call bridges only connect to the master database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
11 months ago
I think I remember that call bridges can connect to multiple databases, but I'm not sure if it's full mesh or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
11 months ago
Hmm, this is testing my knowledge of the database architecture. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the details here. I'll need to re-read the section on setting up a resilient and scalable Cisco Meeting Server deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
11 months ago
Ah, I've seen this type of question before. I'm pretty confident I can work through this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key is understanding how the call bridges interact with the database cluster. I'll need to review that part of the material.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the relationship between the call bridges and the databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
2 years ago
I'm going with B. Keeping the call bridges connected to the master database is the way to go for a reliable setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
2 years ago
Ha! Option A sounds like a recipe for a tangled web. A full mesh database connection? No thank you!
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it could lead to a lot of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, a full mesh database connection sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynette
2 years ago
But wouldn't allowing call bridges to read/write to any database in a cluster create potential issues with data consistency?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
2 years ago
C makes the most sense to me. Limiting to one call bridge per domain ensures consistent configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Emile
1 year ago
True, it's all about finding the right balance between redundancy and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
1 year ago
That's a good point, but having one call bridge per domain can prevent configuration conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to have multiple call bridges for redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
2 years ago
I agree, having one call bridge per domain simplifies management.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynette
2 years ago
Because having multiple call bridges in the same domain can cause conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
2 years ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
2 years ago
D seems too good to be true. Call bridges accessing any database in the cluster at any time? Hmm, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
Golda
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, it seems like it could cause some issues with data consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 years ago
User 1: I agree, option D does sound a bit risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynette
2 years ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 years ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The call bridges should only connect to the master database for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
2 years ago
I'm not sure about option D. It seems risky for call bridges to have full read/write access to any database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
2 years ago
I think option C might also be a good choice. Having only one call bridge per domain could help with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
2 years ago
I agree, option B is the correct answer. It's important for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel