Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-490 Exam - Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Which are two advantages of a ''one switch at a time'' approach to integrating SD-Access into an existing brownfield environment? (Choose two.)
A) appropriate for campus and remote site environments and B) ideal for protecting recent investment s while upgrading legacy hardware
C) involves the least risk of all approaches
D) allows simplified roll back
E) opens up many new design and deployment opportunities
F) allows simplified testing prior to cutover

Cisco 500-490 Exam - Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-490 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All 500-490 Questions]

Which are two advantages of a ''one switch at a time'' approach to integrating SD-Access into an existing brownfield environment? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Paris at Jun 24, 2024, 11:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-490 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sylvia
9 months ago
E sounds nice, but can it really deliver on those opportunities?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
9 months ago
Surprised to see D as an advantage, really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
10 months ago
C is a bit misleading, there's always some risk involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
10 months ago
I think B is spot on too, protects investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
10 months ago
A is definitely true, works well for campuses!
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
10 months ago
I vaguely remember that this approach involves less risk overall, which might be a key point to consider for the advantages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
11 months ago
I feel like the option about simplified rollback could be a good choice too, but I can't recall if it was emphasized in our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
11 months ago
I think protecting recent investments while upgrading legacy hardware is definitely one of the advantages. It makes sense to not waste resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
11 months ago
I remember that the "one switch at a time" approach helps minimize disruption, but I'm not sure which options highlight that best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
11 months ago
This question is right in my wheelhouse. The "one switch at a time" approach is definitely the way to go for integrating SD-Access into an existing network. I know exactly which two advantages to choose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
11 months ago
The "one switch at a time" strategy seems like it could be a smart way to test things out and make sure the transition goes smoothly. I'll select the options that mention simplified testing and reduced risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally clear on what "brownfield environment" means in this context. I'll need to think through how this approach would work for both campus and remote site environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
11 months ago
The "one switch at a time" approach sounds like it could be a good way to gradually integrate SD-Access while minimizing risk and disruption. I'll focus on the options that mention protecting recent investments and allowing for rollback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key advantages of the "one switch at a time" approach before selecting my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
11 months ago
Based on the information provided, a stream cipher seems like the most likely answer. The one-letter-at-a-time encryption with a fixed key is a classic stream cipher property. I'll mark A as my final answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. The IT4IT definition seems to be asking about a specific UML concept. I'll need to review my UML knowledge to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure here, but I think having points near the center line suggests the process is stable? Maybe it's a good sign?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
2 years ago
Protecting recent investments and simplified testing? That's like getting the best of both worlds. It's like having your cake and eating it too... Wait, can you eat cake and test networking gear at the same time? Hmm, food for thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
2 years ago
Ah, the old 'one switch at a time' approach. It's like the tortoise and the hare, but with more networking gear. Slow and steady wins the race, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
2 years ago
D and F all the way, baby! Simplified rollback and testing? Heck yeah, that's the kind of thing that makes my IT heart flutter.
upvoted 0 times
Nickie
2 years ago
Yeah, it definitely makes the process smoother and less risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 years ago
It's great to hear that the 'one switch at a time' approach offers simplified rollback and testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 years ago
I agree, those advantages are really important when integrating SD-Access into an existing environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
2 years ago
D and F are definitely the way to go. Simplified rollback and testing are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
2 years ago
Ooh, 'one switch at a time' and simplified testing? Sign me up! I don't know about you, but I'm all about reducing risk. Less stress, more success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
2 years ago
Option B is spot on. Gotta protect those recent investments, am I right? The 'one switch at a time' approach seems like the perfect way to do that.
upvoted 0 times
Lang
2 years ago
F) allows simplified testing prior to cutover
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 years ago
Yes, protecting investments is crucial. The 'one switch at a time' approach sounds like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
2 years ago
B) ideal for protecting recent investments while upgrading legacy hardware
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
2 years ago
A) appropriate for campus and remote site environments
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
2 years ago
Gerald: That's true. The 'one switch at a time' approach seems like a smart way to go about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 years ago
User Comment: I agree. It's crucial to upgrade without losing what we already have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
2 years ago
Option B is definitely important. We don't want to waste recent investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilford
2 years ago
I think the 'one switch at a time' approach is the way to go. It's the safest option and allows us to test things out before fully committing. Plus, who doesn't love a good old-fashioned rollback?
upvoted 0 times
Jame
2 years ago
F) allows simplified testing prior to cutover
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
2 years ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
2 years ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 years ago
Yes, I agree. It's important to minimize risk and have a safety net in case something goes wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
2 years ago
D) allows simplified roll back
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
2 years ago
A) appropriate for campus and remote site environments
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catina
2 years ago
I believe option F is also important. Simplified testing before cutover can help prevent any major issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
2 years ago
I agree with Caren. Upgrading legacy hardware can be costly, so it's important to protect investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
2 years ago
I think option B is a good advantage because it helps protect recent investments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel