Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-430 Exam - Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

What is the minimum recommended number of nodes for a redundant Events Service?
A) 1
B) 2
C) 3
D) 4

Cisco 500-430 Exam - Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-430 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All 500-430 Questions]

What is the minimum recommended number of nodes for a redundant Events Service?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In a hybrid deployment of AppDynamics, where the AppDynamics Controller and Events Service are installed on-premises and the EUM Server is hosted in AppDynamics' SaaS cloud, the data that is unavailable is the analytics metrics for End-User Monitoring data sets. This is because the analytics metrics require the Events Service to store and process the unstructured data generated by the EUM agents. However, in a hybrid deployment, the EUM Server and the Events Service are not connected, and the EUM Server does not send the EUM data to the Events Service.Therefore, the analytics metrics for EUM data sets, such as browser records, mobile snapshots, network requests, and custom events, are not available in the Controller UI or the Analytics UI1.The other data, such as resource loading times, session information, and browser snapshots, are available in the EUM Server UI, as they are stored and displayed by the EUM Server itself2.Reference:Hybrid DeploymentandEUM Data Setsin the AppDynamics documentation.


by Pete at May 17, 2024, 12:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Octavio
9 months ago
4 nodes is overkill, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
9 months ago
Wait, is it really just 2? That seems low!
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
10 months ago
I heard it could be 3, not sure though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
10 months ago
Definitely agree, 2 is the minimum!
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
I think it's 2 nodes for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards 2 nodes, but I could be mixing it up with another topic we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
11 months ago
I feel like it might be 4 nodes, but that seems a bit high for just redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe the answer was 3 nodes for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
11 months ago
I think I remember something about redundancy needing at least two nodes, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. The minimum recommended number of nodes for a redundant Events Service is 3, to ensure high availability and failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
11 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. I'll have to review my notes on redundancy best practices to try to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the redundancy requirements for an Events Service to determine the minimum number of nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
11 months ago
I'm confident the answer is 2 nodes. Redundancy for an Events Service can be achieved with a minimum of 2 nodes to provide failover capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about realigning the company's security initiatives to include privacy protection. The key will be to thoroughly understand the legal and regulatory requirements for data privacy in each region, as well as industry standards like ISO 27001/2 or NIST 800-53. From there, we can identify the key risks and implement the appropriate controls to protect sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Could it also be something like "Serious information security incidents"?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit unsure about some of these options. I think I'll go with C, E, and F - the lack of control over hardware, the complexity of installation and maintenance, and the potential performance issues even with validated hardware. Hopefully, that covers the main disadvantages they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
11 months ago
I feel like the valuation error might be adjusting because it affects the financial statements directly, but the timing really confuses me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
1 year ago
I bet the correct answer is 3 nodes. That way, if one node goes down, the other two can have a heated debate about who's responsible while the events pile up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 year ago
2 nodes, definitely. Unless of course, you want to be the person who has to explain to the boss why the whole system crashed because one node went down.
upvoted 0 times
Cecilia
1 year ago
C) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
1 year ago
2 nodes are definitely the way to go for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
1 year ago
B) 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
1 year ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mona
1 year ago
I'm going to go with 4 nodes. Redundancy is great, but can you really call it an 'Events Service' if it doesn't have a whole development team on standby?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
3 nodes? Overkill! With 2 nodes, you get high availability and failover. Anything more is just showing off, like a tech hipster with a 10-node Events Service.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
1 year ago
C) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 year ago
2 nodes are enough for high availability and failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 year ago
B) 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
1 year ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Crista
1 year ago
Hmm, if I want redundancy, I'd say the minimum should be 2. One node is just a single point of failure waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
Marjory
1 year ago
Having just 1 node is risky, so I would choose option B) 2 nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 year ago
I would go with option B) 2 nodes for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
1 year ago
I think 2 nodes would be the minimum for a redundant Events Service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
1 year ago
I agree, having at least 2 nodes for redundancy is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florinda
1 year ago
That makes sense. I agree with you, Lore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
1 year ago
I think it's B) 2, because having only one node wouldn't provide redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
1 year ago
What is the minimum recommended number of nodes for a redundant Events Service?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel