Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-425 Exam - Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

When troubleshooting an application using AppDynamics. which order would help narrow down a code problem with a specific business transactionthe fastest?
A) Review Application Dashboard > Check transaction scorecard > Check Transactions snapshots for problems
B) Review Exceptions > Look at Errors > Use Compare Releases
C) Review Application Dashboard > Look at Events > Check Service Endpoints
D) Review tier and node metrics > Check Database Calls and metrics > Review Application Dashboard

Cisco 500-425 Exam - Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-425 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 3
[All 500-425 Questions]

When troubleshooting an application using AppDynamics. which order would help narrow down a code problem with a specific business transaction

the fastest?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When troubleshooting an application using AppDynamics, the fastest way to narrow down a code problem with a specific business transaction is to follow this order:

Review Application Dashboard: This is the first step to get an overview of the health and performance of your application and its components. You can see the key metrics, such as response time, throughput, error rate, and load, for each tier, node, and business transaction. You can also see the health rule violations, events, and alerts that indicate any issues or anomalies in your application.

Check transaction scorecard: This is the second step to drill down to the details of a specific business transaction that you want to troubleshoot. You can see the transaction scorecard by clicking on the business transaction name on the application dashboard. The transaction scorecard shows the metrics, such as average response time, calls per minute, errors per minute, and slow calls, for the selected business transaction. You can also see the breakdown of the response time by tier, node, and remote service, and the distribution of the response time by percentile.

Check transaction snapshots for problems: This is the third step to identify the root cause of the code problem for the selected business transaction. You can see the transaction snapshots by clicking on the View Snapshots button on the transaction scorecard. Transaction snapshots are the detailed records of the execution of a business transaction, including the call graph, the exit calls, the errors, the exceptions, the logs, the HTTP parameters, the cookies, the session attributes, and the custom data. You can use the transaction snapshots to analyze the code execution, the database queries, the web service calls, the message queues, the errors, and the exceptions that affect the performance of the business transaction.

Therefore,A(Review Application Dashboard > Check transaction scorecard > Check Transactions snapshots for problems) is the correct answer.Reference:

Cisco AppDynamics Associate Administrator Certification

Troubleshoot Business Transactions - AppDynamics

Business Transaction - AppDynamics

Transaction Snapshots - AppDynamics


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ettie
9 months ago
D seems too complicated for a quick fix, stick with A!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
9 months ago
Surprised that people think A is best, I’d go with C for a broader view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
10 months ago
Not sure about that, B could be quicker if there are lots of errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
10 months ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
10 months ago
I think option A is the fastest way to pinpoint issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m not confident. I remember metrics are important, but I’m not sure if they help narrow down code problems as fast as the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
11 months ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and I think option B might be useful for understanding errors, but it seems slower than A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about checking transaction scorecards being crucial for identifying issues quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
11 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense since starting with the Application Dashboard gives a good overview of the transaction's health.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the right answer here. The fastest way to narrow down the issue is to review the exceptions and errors, then use the Compare Releases feature to pinpoint the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to start broad with the Application Dashboard, then drill down into the transaction scorecard and snapshots to identify the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different steps here. I'll need to review the AppDynamics documentation to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'm not too familiar with AppDynamics, so I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about financial reporting structures. I'll think through the options carefully and choose the one that best matches the requirement to track consolidated reports by legal entity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
11 months ago
I think option D might be the best approach here. Enabling both lot and grade control would allow me to capture the different purity levels as grades within the same lot. That seems like the most straightforward way to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question if you know your IT laws. The Clinger-Cohen Act is the obvious choice here, since it was specifically designed to improve how the federal government uses and manages technology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this question. The key is recognizing that a tidal wave is an oceanic event, so the scientists who study oceans would be the ones best equipped to analyze how a volcanic eruption could cause that. I'll select the option for "Scientist who study oceans" as my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
2 years ago
I thought about B. Focusing on exceptions first might save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
2 years ago
I was considering D. Metrics can reveal a lot before diving deeper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
2 years ago
I think starting with the Application Dashboard gives a good overview. Makes sense to start there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
2 years ago
Why A, Bob?
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
2 years ago
Yeah, it's tricky. I'm leaning toward A though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
2 years ago
That question is confusing me a bit. Anyone else?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel