Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 5 Question 42 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Which two actions are required to optimize load balancing asymmetrically with a 4:1 ratio between links? (Choose two.)
B) Add an internet traffic preference that defines the load-balancing ratio as 4:1.
A) Change the primary uplink to 'none'.
C) Enable load balancing.
D) Set the speed of the cellular uplink to zero.
E) Change the assigned speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 so that the ratio is 4:1.

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 5 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 5
[All 500-220 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which two actions are required to optimize load balancing asymmetrically with a 4:1 ratio between links? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Novella
9 months ago
Adding an internet traffic preference is definitely a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
10 months ago
Wait, why would you set the cellular uplink speed to zero?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
10 months ago
Isn't changing the primary uplink to 'none' risky?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
10 months ago
Totally agree, that's the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
10 months ago
You need to set the speeds for WAN 1 and WAN 2 to 4:1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like we definitely need to adjust the assigned speeds for the links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should enable load balancing first or just change the speeds directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
11 months ago
I remember something about defining a load-balancing ratio, so maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
11 months ago
I think we need to set the speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 to achieve that 4:1 ratio, but I'm not sure if that's the only step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about how to approach this. I know we need to use graphical linear programming, but I'm not sure how to identify the optimal production plan from the graph.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll start by reviewing the debug logs with the flow logging level to see what's going on. That should give me the information I need to get the flow working properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
11 months ago
This is a tough one. I can see the merits of both option A and option B. On one hand, we have the experience to test similar releases, but on the other hand, 2 weeks seems like a really tight timeline without any specs. I might try to negotiate for a bit more time if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
I'm going with B and E. Seems like the most logical way to achieve the 4:1 load-balancing ratio between the links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
1 year ago
Haha, D is a funny one. Setting the cellular uplink speed to zero? That's a bold move, but I don't think it's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Quinn
1 year ago
Yeah, setting the cellular uplink speed to zero does seem like a bold move, but I agree that it's probably not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
1 year ago
E) Change the assigned speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 so that the ratio is 4:1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
1 year ago
A) Change the primary uplink to 'none.'
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beckie
1 year ago
B and E seem like the correct answers. Defining the load-balancing ratio and setting the speeds accordingly makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Shaniqua
1 year ago
Setting the speed of the cellular uplink to zero may not be necessary if we adjust the speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
1 year ago
Changing the primary uplink to 'none' doesn't seem relevant for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
1 year ago
Enabling load balancing is also necessary for optimizing the load balancing asymmetrically.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
I agree, setting the speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 to a 4:1 ratio is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 year ago
Setting the speed of the cellular uplink to zero would help achieve the desired load balancing ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
1 year ago
Enabling load balancing is also important for optimizing the 4:1 ratio between links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
Changing the primary uplink to 'none' and setting the speed ratio would optimize load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
1 year ago
I agree, B and E are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
1 year ago
I'm not sure about changing the primary uplink to 'none'. I think focusing on adjusting the speeds and enabling load balancing is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
I agree with Louann. That, along with enabling load balancing, should help achieve the 4:1 ratio between links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
1 year ago
I think we need to change the assigned speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 to optimize load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
1 year ago
Hmm, I think E is the way to go. Adjusting the assigned speeds to a 4:1 ratio should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Yong
1 year ago
Let's make sure to change the speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
1 year ago
We should also enable load balancing to optimize it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
1 year ago
I agree, adjusting the speeds should help with the load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 year ago
E sounds like a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregg
1 year ago
But do we also need to enable load balancing for it to work properly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
I agree with you, Viola. That would help achieve the 4:1 ratio between links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 year ago
I think we need to change the assigned speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 to optimize load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel