Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 11 Question 38 Discussion

One thousand concurrent users stream video to their laptops. A 30/70 split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz is used.Based on client count, how many APs (rounded to the nearest whole number) are needed?
B) 28
A) 26
C) 30
D) 32

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 11 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 11
[All 500-220 Questions]

One thousand concurrent users stream video to their laptops. A 30/70 split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz is used.

Based on client count, how many APs (rounded to the nearest whole number) are needed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Erick at Mar 21, 2023, 06:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maryann
10 months ago
I heard 32 is the standard for heavy streaming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
10 months ago
30 APs might be safer, just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
11 months ago
Totally agree, 28 sounds right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
11 months ago
I think 28 APs should cover it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
11 months ago
I vaguely recall that for video streaming, we might need more APs due to bandwidth requirements. I hope I remember the right numbers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about how to round the number of APs. Do we just take the total and round up, or is there a specific formula we should use?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to consider the different capacities of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. I feel like 5 GHz can handle more users, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
11 months ago
I remember something about calculating APs based on user density, but I'm not sure how to apply the 30/70 split here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
11 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think Archive mode is the best choice here since it's specifically mentioned as enabling historical data extraction. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the "inclusion is better than exclusion" option. I'll need to double-check that one in my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure these users aren't just watching cat videos on their laptops? I'm going with 29 APs, just to cover my bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
28 APs, huh? Sounds like a nice, even number. Though I'm kind of hoping for a trick question and the answer is actually 31 APs, just to keep us on our toes.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
1 year ago
I agree, 28 APs sounds like the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
1 year ago
Yeah, it seems like a good number for the split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
1 year ago
I think 28 APs makes sense with that many users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rex
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the person who came up with this question was picturing a full-blown stadium of video streamers. 26 APs, just to keep things interesting!
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
1 year ago
D) 32
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 year ago
C) 30
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
1 year ago
B) 28
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
1 year ago
A) 26
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
1 year ago
D) 32
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
1 year ago
C) 30
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
1 year ago
B) 28
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
1 year ago
A) 26
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nohemi
1 year ago
30 APs? Nah, I think 32 is the way to go. Better safe than sorry when it comes to handling that many concurrent users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
1 year ago
So, if we divide 1000 by 2 for each band, we get 500 clients per band. With a maximum of 30 clients per AP, we would need 17 APs for 2.4 GHz and 17 APs for 5 GHz, totaling 34 APs. Since the question asks for the nearest whole number, I would choose option D) 32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm going to go with option C - 30 APs. Gotta make sure those 1,000 users can stream their videos without any buffering issues.
upvoted 0 times
Elizabeth
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds about right. Option C it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
User 1: I think we need 30 APs for all those users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herminia
1 year ago
I agree. With 1000 users and a 30/70 split, we should calculate the number of APs needed for each frequency band.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
1 year ago
I think we need to consider the number of clients per AP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel