Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 5 Question 23 Discussion

Company XYZ wants to deploy OSPF. The design plan requires that two OSPF networks be mutually redistributed at multiple locations and ensure end-to-end connectivity to all of the company's networks Which technology can be used to fulfill the requirements while avoiding the creation of routing loops?
A) Create a virtual link between ASBRs.
B) Change the router ID for both ASBRs.
C) Redistribute routes as external type 2 routes.
D) Use route maps on ASBRs to filter routes with tags so they are not redistributed.

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 5 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 5
[All 400-007 Questions]

Company XYZ wants to deploy OSPF. The design plan requires that two OSPF networks be mutually redistributed at multiple locations and ensure end-to-end connectivity to all of the company's networks Which technology can be used to fulfill the requirements while avoiding the creation of routing loops?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nikita
9 months ago
Wait, can you really use route maps like that? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
10 months ago
Totally agree with C, it’s the standard approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
10 months ago
A seems a bit risky, not sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
10 months ago
I think D is better for avoiding loops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
10 months ago
C is the way to go for external routes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think using route maps to filter routes is a solid approach, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the only solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
11 months ago
I feel like redistributing as external type 2 routes could be the right answer, especially since it helps with loop prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
11 months ago
I think creating a virtual link between ASBRs might help, but I’m not completely confident about how that would prevent routing loops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
I remember we discussed OSPF redistribution in class, but I'm not sure if using route maps is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is C, "Perimeter." That seems to be the most general and accurate term for the boundary of a company's property, regardless of the specific type of boundary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward data cleaning task. I'd probably go with option C and use Cloud Dataflow to handle the data processing. That way, I can keep the original data in Cloud Storage and create a new cleaned-up dataset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward WAN question. The description of the corporate network being spread across multiple cities and using roto connect the subnetworks is a clear indicator of a wide area network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. We need to configure networking between Cisco Unity Connection clusters, so the IP address or FQDN of the Cisco Unity Connection servers is definitely one requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
11 months ago
I practiced a question like this in our study group! I think the role of the person is key to answering it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 year ago
Wait, does this mean I can't just use OSPF as is? I thought it was supposed to be a magical routing protocol that solves everything!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
A virtual link between ASBRs? That's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure if that's the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
1 year ago
D sounds promising, but I'm not sure if route maps with tags are the best solution here. Might be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Coral
1 year ago
I agree, using route maps with tags might be too complex for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 year ago
D) Use route maps on ASBRs to filter routes with tags so they are not redistributed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
1 year ago
B) Change the router ID for both ASBRs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
1 year ago
A) Create a virtual link between ASBRs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edgar
1 year ago
Definitely not B. Changing the router ID won't do anything to address the routing loop issue.
upvoted 0 times
Shanice
1 year ago
Agreed, B wouldn't solve the routing loop problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
D) Use route maps on ASBRs to filter routes with tags so they are not redistributed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 year ago
A) Create a virtual link between ASBRs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyril
1 year ago
Hmm, I think C is the way to go. Redistributing as external type 2 routes should help avoid routing loops.
upvoted 0 times
Marylyn
1 year ago
User3: I'm not sure about A. I think D might be a better option. Using route maps on ASBRs to filter routes with tags could help avoid routing loops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
1 year ago
User2: I agree with User1. A virtual link sounds like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 year ago
User1: I think A is the best option. Creating a virtual link between ASBRs can help avoid routing loops.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edelmira
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but creating a virtual link between ASBRs could also work, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 year ago
I agree with Vincenza, using route maps with tags is a good way to prevent routing loops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
1 year ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
1 year ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel