MENU
Company XYZ Is running a redundant private WAN network using OSPF as the underlay protocol The current design accommodates for redundancy In the network, but it Is taking over 30 seconds for the network to reconverge upon failure Which technique can be Implemented In the design to detect such a failure in a subsecond?
Suggested Answer: E
Get Premium 400-007 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
RE
Ressie
10 months ago
30 seconds? Wow, that seems way too long for reconvergence!
JO
Joanna
10 months ago
Flex links? Never heard of that being used for this.
HA
Harley
10 months ago
OSPF LFA is great for fast reroute!
IR
Ira
11 months ago
BFD is the way to go for subsecond detection.
BE
Bette
11 months ago
I thought STP was for loop prevention, not failure detection?
TA
Tawny
11 months ago
OSPF LFA sounds familiar, but I feel like BFD is the more common technique for subsecond failure detection.
SU
Sueann
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about fate sharing. I don’t recall it being related to rapid failure detection in OSPF.
JA
Jacquline
11 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where BFD was mentioned as a solution for faster failure detection. It might be the answer.
BE
Ben
12 months ago
I remember studying OSPF and how it can take time to reconverge, but I’m not sure if BFD is the right choice here.
TR
Tricia
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between some of these options like fate sharing and flex links. I'll need to do some research to understand which one is most appropriate here.
GI
Gianna
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards D. BFD since the question specifically asks for a subsecond failure detection technique, and that seems to fit the bill.
VI
Vicki
1 year ago
OSPF LFA could also be a good option to consider. It provides fast convergence without needing to configure an additional protocol like BFD.
CA
Carmelina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with BFD. I'll need to review the details of how it works to be sure it's the right choice here.
JO
Johna
1 year ago
I think the answer is D. BFD seems like the best option to quickly detect a network failure and trigger a fast reconvergence.
SI
Silvana
1 year ago
Gotta love it when the perfect solution is just a simple protocol like BFD. D all the way!
TH
Thaddeus
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the network admin wishes they had implemented BFD from the start! D is definitely the right answer here.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
Definitely, OSPF LFA wouldn't provide the subsecond detection needed like BFD would.
RO
Royal
1 year ago
STP wouldn't cut it for this scenario, BFD is the best choice.
RI
Rickie
1 year ago
Yeah, BFD is the way to go for subsecond failure detection.
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
I agree, BFD would definitely help with faster convergence.
TH
Theola
1 year ago
Hmm, I was debating between C and D, but I think D. BFD is the way to go. It's purpose-built for rapid failure detection, which is exactly what they need here.
LO
Lore
1 year ago
User 3: Agreed, BFD is the best option for subsecond failure detection.
WA
Wayne
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, BFD is designed for rapid failure detection.
LE
Leontine
1 year ago
User 1: I think D. BFD is the way to go.
WI
Wilda
1 year ago
I'm going with D as well. BFD is the perfect solution for this scenario - it can detect failures much faster than OSPF's normal operation.
KR
Kristin
1 year ago
I'm going with D as well. BFD is the perfect solution for this scenario - it can detect failures much faster than OSPF's normal operation.
CA
Carlton
1 year ago
E) flex links
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
D) BFD
AL
Alica
1 year ago
C) OSPF LFA
SY
Sylvie
1 year ago
B) fate sharing
VE
Venita
1 year ago
A) STP
HE
Heike
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think OSPF LFA could also be a good option for faster convergence.
KA
Karan
1 year ago
I agree with Olen, BFD can help detect failures quickly.
WE
Wenona
2 years ago
D. BFD sounds right to me. It's a great way to get that sub-second failure detection without having to rely on the slower OSPF convergence process.
OD
Odette
1 year ago
User 4: BFD seems like the most efficient choice for quick failure detection.
BE
Belen
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, BFD is much faster than waiting for OSPF to reconverge.
NA
Natalie
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, BFD is definitely the best option for that.
AN
Anika
1 year ago
User 1: I think BFD is the way to go for sub-second failure detection.
OL
Olen
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) BFD.
KI
Kip
2 years ago
I think the answer is D. BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) is a protocol designed specifically for quick failure detection, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
FE
Felicitas
1 year ago
Yes, BFD is the way to go for fast network convergence.
RE
Reuben
1 year ago
I agree, BFD is the best option for subsecond failure detection.