Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam

Question #: 33
Topic #: 3

Refer to the exhibit.

After a network audit a network engineer must optimize the current network convergence time The proposed solution must consider link layer and control plane failures. Which solution meets the requirements?

AConfigure debounce timers

BIncrease fast hello timers

CImplement BFD

DEnable LSP fast flood

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Franklyn at Feb 10, 2024, 11:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Suzi

9 months ago

Debounce timers? Not sure that’s effective for convergence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

9 months ago

LSP fast flood sounds interesting, but does it really address failures?

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaac

10 months ago

Wait, are we sure BFD is the best option?

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

10 months ago

I think increasing fast hello timers could help too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

10 months ago

Implement BFD is the way to go for faster convergence!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elizabeth

10 months ago

Debounce timers sound familiar, but I can't recall if they really optimize convergence time. I think they might be more about stability than speed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salena

11 months ago

I practiced a similar question where enabling LSP fast flood was mentioned. It might be relevant, but I feel like BFD is more effective for link layer issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think increasing fast hello timers could help with convergence too. I need to double-check that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

11 months ago

I remember studying about BFD and how it helps with faster failure detection. It seems like a strong option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawna

11 months ago

I think I've got this one. Implementing BFD is definitely the way to go. It's designed specifically for rapid failure detection, which is exactly what the question is asking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

11 months ago

Ah, I see what they're getting at. Implementing BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) would be the best solution to meet the stated requirements. That should provide fast failure detection across both the link and control plane.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kindra

11 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'm going to eliminate the options that don't seem to directly address both the link layer and control plane requirements. That should help me narrow it down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leigha

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different areas, so I'll need to carefully consider how each one impacts convergence time and failure handling.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

11 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward network optimization question. I think the key is to focus on solutions that address both link layer and control plane failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different options, but I'm not sure which one is the "BEST" approach. I'll need to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

11 months ago

The Responsive feature sounds like the way to go. I just need to make sure I understand how to properly configure it to achieve the desired layout on different devices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanda

11 months ago

I'm not sure about the numbersâ€”might use SIP = FV target / [((1+r)^n - 1)/r]. Need to apply 60:40.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

2 years ago

Candidate 6: Yeah, it's important to consider both options and choose the one that best fits the network's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tenesha

2 years ago

Candidate 5: I think both C) Implement BFD and D) Enable LSP fast flood could work, depending on the specific network requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmela

2 years ago

Candidate 4: LSP fast flood could be a good choice too, it helps in quickly propagating link state information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juan

2 years ago

Candidate 3: I'm not sure about BFD, maybe D) Enable LSP fast flood could also work for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darci

2 years ago

Candidate 2: I agree with that, BFD is definitely a good choice for optimizing network convergence time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

2 years ago

Candidate 1: I think the answer is C) Implement BFD because it helps in fast detection of failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamonica

2 years ago

Yeah, BFD sounds like the way to go. Plus, it's vendor-agnostic, so it should work in a variety of network environments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krissy

2 years ago

I'm leaning towards C - Implement BFD. It's designed to quickly detect and notify routing protocols of failures, which should help with convergence.

upvoted 0 times

Lindsay

2 years ago

Great, let's go with C) Implement BFD as the solution for optimizing network convergence time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

2 years ago

Definitely, BFD would address both link layer and control plane failures for quicker detection and notification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

2 years ago

Makes sense, so C) Implement BFD is likely the most efficient solution for optimizing network convergence time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Apolonia

2 years ago

Debounce timers may help with filtering out duplicate link state advertisements, but BFD would still be more effective for faster detection of failures.

upvoted 0 times

...